{ "id": "RL33844", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "number": "RL33844", "active": false, "source": "EveryCRSReport.com, University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "versions": [ { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 421355, "date": "2010-01-27", "retrieved": "2016-04-07T01:59:56.259394", "title": "Foreign Investor Visas: Policies and Issues", "summary": "With the current economic downturn, Members of the 111th Congress are likely to be faced with many policy options aimed at economic improvement, including the possible consideration of amending visa categories for foreign investors. Foreign investors are often viewed as providing employment opportunities for U.S. citizens rather than displacing native workers. Yet, extending foreign investor visas provides several potential risks as well, such as visa abuses and security concerns. Thus, a potential policy question for Congress\u2014and particularly legal permanent resident (LPR) investors\u2014is whether the benefits reaped from allocating visas to foreign investors outweigh the costs of denying visas to other employment-based groups.\nThere are currently two categories of nonimmigrant investor visas and one category of immigrant investor visa for legal permanent residents (LPR). The visa categories used for nonimmigrant investors are: E-1 for treaty traders; and the E-2 for treaty investors. The visa category used for immigrant investors is the fifth preference employment-based (EB-5) visa category. According to Department of Homeland Security (DHS) statistics, there were 230,647 nonimmigrant treaty trader and investor visa arrivals in the United States in FY2008. For the same time frame, DHS reported the granting of 1,360 investor visas.\nWhen viewed from a comparative perspective, the investor visas of the United States are most closely mirrored by those of Canada. The LPR investor visa draws especially strong parallels to the Canadian immigrant investor visa, since the latter served as the model for the former. Comparing the admissions data between these two countries, however, reveals that the Canadian investor provision attracts many times the number of investors of its United States counterpart. Yet, both countries showed an upward trend in immigrant investor visas in the last two years.\nThe investor visas offered by the United States operate on the principle that foreign direct investment into the United States should spur economic growth in the United States. According to the classical theory, if these investments are properly targeted towards the U.S. labor force\u2019s skill sets, it should reduce the international migration pressures on U.S. workers. To attract foreign investors, research indicates that temporary migrants are motivated most significantly by employment and wage prospects, while permanent migrants are motivated by professional and social mobility. Theoretically, however, it is unclear to what extent potential migration provides additional incentive for investment activity. Investors from developed countries may sometimes lack incentive to settle in the United States since they can achieve foreign direct investment (FDI) and similar standards of living from their home country. Yet, in cases where foreign investors have been attracted, the economic benefits have been positive and significant.\nImmigrant investors have been subject to notable administrative efforts in the past couple of years. In 2005, DHS developed the Investor and Regional Center Unit (IRCU) to govern matters concerning LPR investor visas and investments to better adjudicate petitions and coordinate investments. In the 111th Congress, authorizing language in the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-83, \u00a7548), extends the authorization of the Regional Center Pilot Program through September 30, 2012.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL33844", "sha1": "351f2a708718981ae0181e40c5e77170955eb9b3", "filename": "files/20100127_RL33844_351f2a708718981ae0181e40c5e77170955eb9b3.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL33844", "sha1": "802b8d64eb75139c932762a3b1ddc7326c94dc63", "filename": "files/20100127_RL33844_802b8d64eb75139c932762a3b1ddc7326c94dc63.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc743404/", "id": "RL33844_2009Feb24", "date": "2009-02-24", "retrieved": "2015-10-20T21:35:54", "title": "Foreign Investor Visas: Policies and Issues", "summary": "This report provides a brief legislative background, discussions of immigrant and nonimmigrant investor's visas, a comparison of U.S. and Canadian immigrant investor programs, an analysis of the relationship between investment and migration, and finally a review of current issues.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20090224_RL33844_af3e3b39fa99adfc9cf83e331a7c33e0549ad4e3.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20090224_RL33844_af3e3b39fa99adfc9cf83e331a7c33e0549ad4e3.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Immigration", "name": "Immigration" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Visas", "name": "Visas" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Immigration policy", "name": "Immigration policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Foreign investments -- U.S.", "name": "Foreign investments -- U.S." }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Foreign economic relations -- U.S.", "name": "Foreign economic relations -- U.S." }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "International economic relations", "name": "International economic relations" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc462364/", "id": "RL33844_2008May01", "date": "2008-05-01", "retrieved": "2014-12-05T09:57:41", "title": "Foreign Investor Visas: Policies and Issues", "summary": "This report provides a brief legislative background, discussions of immigrant and nonimmigrant investors visas, a comparison of U.S. and Canadian immigrant investor programs, an analysis of the relationship between investment and migration, and finally a review of current issues.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20080501_RL33844_a494e4bb241278f3ccc472508e4b26a1cae07be1.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20080501_RL33844_a494e4bb241278f3ccc472508e4b26a1cae07be1.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Immigration", "name": "Immigration" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Visas", "name": "Visas" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Immigration policy", "name": "Immigration policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Foreign investments -- U.S.", "name": "Foreign investments -- U.S." }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Foreign economic relations -- U.S.", "name": "Foreign economic relations -- U.S." }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "International economic relations", "name": "International economic relations" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc808828/", "id": "RL33844_2007Jan29", "date": "2007-01-29", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Foreign Investor Visas: Policies and Issues", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20070129_RL33844_968a9447745a913ba315973cebb3a39c9233e938.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20070129_RL33844_968a9447745a913ba315973cebb3a39c9233e938.html" } ], "topics": [] } ], "topics": [ "Appropriations", "Foreign Affairs", "Immigration Policy" ] }