{ "id": "RL33946", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "number": "RL33946", "active": false, "source": "EveryCRSReport.com, University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "versions": [ { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 376549, "date": "2011-01-18", "retrieved": "2016-04-07T01:10:20.987666", "title": "Navy Nuclear-Powered Surface Ships: Background, Issues, and Options for Congress", "summary": "All of the Navy\u2019s aircraft carriers, but none of its other surface ships, are nuclear-powered. Some Members of Congress, particularly on the House Armed Services Committee, have expressed interest in expanding the use of nuclear power to a wider array of Navy surface ships, starting with the CG(X), a planned new cruiser that the Navy had wanted to start procuring around FY2017. Section 1012 of the FY2008 Defense Authorization Act (H.R. 4986/P.L. 110-181 of January 28, 2008) made it U.S. policy to construct the major combatant ships of the Navy, including ships like the CG(X), with integrated nuclear power systems, unless the Secretary of Defense submits a notification to Congress that the inclusion of an integrated nuclear power system in a given class of ship is not in the national interest.\nThe Navy studied nuclear power as a design option for the CG(X), but did not announce whether it would prefer to build the CG(X) as a nuclear-powered ship. The Navy\u2019s FY2011 budget proposed canceling the CG(X) program and instead building an improved version of the conventionally powered Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) class Aegis destroyer. The cancellation of the CG(X) program would appear to leave no near-term shipbuilding program opportunities for expanding the application of nuclear power to Navy surface ships other than aircraft carriers.\nA 2006 Navy study on the potential for applying nuclear-power to Navy surface ships other than aircraft carriers concluded the following, among other things:\nIn constant FY2007 dollars, building a Navy surface combatant or amphibious ship with nuclear power rather than conventional power would add roughly $600 million to $800 million to its procurement cost.\nThe total life-cycle cost of a nuclear-powered medium-size surface combatant would equal that of a conventionally powered medium-size surface combatant if the cost of crude oil averages $70 per barrel to $225 per barrel over the life of the ship.\nNuclear-power should be considered for near-term applications for medium-size surface combatants.\nCompared to conventionally powered ships, nuclear-powered ships have advantages in terms of both time needed to surge to a distant theater of operation for a contingency, and in terms of operational presence (time on station) in the theater of operation.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL33946", "sha1": "b092ae233f773a3be74b698ed4d7f9edfa12cbbd", "filename": "files/20110118_RL33946_b092ae233f773a3be74b698ed4d7f9edfa12cbbd.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL33946", "sha1": "2100f6eb28baaf1449bdab0bb570092ab19c6b32", "filename": "files/20110118_RL33946_2100f6eb28baaf1449bdab0bb570092ab19c6b32.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc29694/", "id": "RL33946_2010Sep29", "date": "2010-09-29", "retrieved": "2010-12-04T14:26:25", "title": "Navy Nuclear-Powered Surface Ships: Background, Issues, and Options for Congress", "summary": "This report discusses the possibility of increasing the number of Navy surface ships powered by nuclear energy, including the Navy's planned CG(X) cruiser. The report explores a 2006 Navy study that discusses budget considerations, the cost of a nuclear-powered ship compared to a ship powered by crude oil, and other suggestions relating to this proposed expansion. The overall report has a specific emphasis on the planned CG(X) cruiser, and how the implementation of this cruiser may be delayed by current budget proposals.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20100929_RL33946_31d016faa9fb3fdead5df2039d5e75230d089965.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20100929_RL33946_31d016faa9fb3fdead5df2039d5e75230d089965.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Transportation", "name": "Transportation" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Warships", "name": "Warships" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Weapons systems", "name": "Weapons systems" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Nuclear warships", "name": "Nuclear warships" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Cruisers", "name": "Cruisers" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc490947/", "id": "RL33946_2010Jun10", "date": "2010-06-10", "retrieved": "2015-01-27T19:40:46", "title": "Navy Nuclear-Powered Surface Ships: Background, Issues, and Options for Congress", "summary": "This report discusses the possibility of increasing the number of Navy surface ships powered by nuclear energy, including the Navy's planned CG(X) cruiser. The report explores a 2006 Navy study that discusses budget considerations, the cost of a nuclear-powered ship compared to a ship powered by crude oil, and other suggestions relating to this proposed expansion. The overall report has a specific emphasis on the planned CG(X) cruiser, and how the implementation of this cruiser may be delayed by current budget proposals.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20100610_RL33946_e6856f27c2008a75cebd0b2a94f2a680aa6bec1e.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20100610_RL33946_e6856f27c2008a75cebd0b2a94f2a680aa6bec1e.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Navy -- U.S.", "name": "Navy -- U.S." }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Warships", "name": "Warships" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Nuclear warships", "name": "Nuclear warships" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Weapons systems", "name": "Weapons systems" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Cruisers", "name": "Cruisers" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc503525/", "id": "RL33946_2010Mar29", "date": "2010-03-29", "retrieved": "2015-04-30T17:37:21", "title": "Navy Nuclear-Powered Surface Ships: Background, Issues, and Options for Congress", "summary": "This report discusses the possibility of increasing the number of Navy surface ships powered by nuclear energy, including the Navy's planned CG(X) cruiser. The report explores a 2006 Navy study that discusses budget considerations, the cost of a nuclear-powered ship compared to a ship powered by crude oil, and other suggestions relating to this proposed expansion. The overall report has a specific emphasis on the planned CG(X) cruiser, and how the implementation of this cruiser may be delayed by current budget proposals.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20100329_RL33946_0fc2724d1c2f87db37e1fe7612079ad0ad5a9051.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20100329_RL33946_0fc2724d1c2f87db37e1fe7612079ad0ad5a9051.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Cruisers", "name": "Cruisers" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Nuclear warships", "name": "Nuclear warships" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Transportation", "name": "Transportation" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Warships", "name": "Warships" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Weapons systems", "name": "Weapons systems" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc627073/", "id": "RL33946_2009Dec23", "date": "2009-12-23", "retrieved": "2015-06-15T14:46:40", "title": "Navy Nuclear-Powered Surface Ships: Background, Issues, and Options for Congress", "summary": "This report discusses the possibility of increasing the number of Navy surface ships powered by nuclear energy, including the Navy's planned CG(X) cruiser. The overall report has a specific emphasis on the planned CG(X) cruiser, and how the implementation of this cruiser may be delayed by current budget proposals.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20091223_RL33946_42181b7d28a8558020c29f3342a071238057c89b.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20091223_RL33946_42181b7d28a8558020c29f3342a071238057c89b.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Transportation", "name": "Transportation" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Warships", "name": "Warships" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Weapons systems", "name": "Weapons systems" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Nuclear warships", "name": "Nuclear warships" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Cruisers", "name": "Cruisers" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc627132/", "id": "RL33946_2009Oct21", "date": "2009-10-21", "retrieved": "2015-06-15T14:46:40", "title": "Navy Nuclear-Powered Surface Ships: Background, Issues, and Options for Congress", "summary": "This report discusses the possibility of increasing the number of Navy surface ships powered by nuclear energy, including the Navy's planned CG(X) cruiser. The overall report has a specific emphasis on the planned CG(X) cruiser, and how the implementation of this cruiser may be delayed by current budget proposals.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20091021_RL33946_c874df88ac7f9f532eab9bf3349a9cce9654862c.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20091021_RL33946_c874df88ac7f9f532eab9bf3349a9cce9654862c.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Transportation", "name": "Transportation" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Warships", "name": "Warships" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Weapons systems", "name": "Weapons systems" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Nuclear warships", "name": "Nuclear warships" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Cruisers", "name": "Cruisers" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc821651/", "id": "RL33946_2009Sep21", "date": "2009-09-21", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Navy Nuclear-Powered Surface Ships: Background, Issues, and Options for Congress", "summary": "This report discusses congressional interest in expanding the use of nuclear power to a wider array of Navy surface ships, starting with the Navy\u2019s planned CG(X) cruiser. The issue for Congress is whether the CG(X) or other future Navy surface ships should be nuclear-powered. Congress\u2019s decisions on this issue could affect, among other things, future Navy capabilities, Navy funding requirements, and the shipbuilding industrial base.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20090921_RL33946_d7f61d325f0936dfd970fbcc3976e89b577e14c8.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20090921_RL33946_d7f61d325f0936dfd970fbcc3976e89b577e14c8.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Transportation", "name": "Transportation" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Warships", "name": "Warships" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Weapons systems", "name": "Weapons systems" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Nuclear warships", "name": "Nuclear warships" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Cruisers", "name": "Cruisers" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc627043/", "id": "RL33946_2009Jul17", "date": "2009-07-17", "retrieved": "2015-06-15T14:46:40", "title": "Navy Nuclear-Powered Surface Ships: Background, Issues, and Options for Congress", "summary": "This report discusses the possibility of increasing the number of Navy surface ships powered by nuclear energy, including the Navy's planned CG(X) cruiser. The report explores a 2006 Navy study that discusses budget considerations, the cost of a nuclear-powered ship compared to a ship powered by crude oil, and other suggestions relating to this proposed expansion. The overall report has a specific emphasis on the planned CG(X) cruiser, and how the implementation of this cruiser may be delayed by current budget proposals.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20090717_RL33946_2cf8e39643c52448a3c3efcf88c4e459e3311051.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20090717_RL33946_2cf8e39643c52448a3c3efcf88c4e459e3311051.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Transportation", "name": "Transportation" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Warships", "name": "Warships" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Weapons systems", "name": "Weapons systems" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Nuclear warships", "name": "Nuclear warships" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Cruisers", "name": "Cruisers" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc627225/", "id": "RL33946_2009May29", "date": "2009-05-29", "retrieved": "2015-06-15T14:46:40", "title": "Navy Nuclear-Powered Surface Ships: Background, Issues, and Options for Congress", "summary": "This report discusses the possibility of increasing the number of Navy surface ships powered by nuclear energy, including the Navy's planned CG(X) cruiser. The overall report has a specific emphasis on the planned CG(X) cruiser, and how the implementation of this cruiser may be delayed by current budget proposals.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20090529_RL33946_ea0d72e27d54dae5046b7198617219eab4f0960d.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20090529_RL33946_ea0d72e27d54dae5046b7198617219eab4f0960d.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Transportation", "name": "Transportation" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Warships", "name": "Warships" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Weapons systems", "name": "Weapons systems" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Nuclear warships", "name": "Nuclear warships" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Cruisers", "name": "Cruisers" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc627138/", "id": "RL33946_2008Oct03", "date": "2008-10-03", "retrieved": "2015-06-15T14:46:40", "title": "Navy Nuclear-Powered Surface Ships: Background, Issues, and Options for Congress", "summary": "This report discusses the possibility of increasing the number of Navy surface ships powered by nuclear energy, including the Navy's planned CG(X) cruiser. The overall report has a specific emphasis on the planned CG(X) cruiser, and how the implementation of this cruiser may be delayed by current budget proposals.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20081003_RL33946_e9fdc320f7de166c21205840a6c58117c99ca659.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20081003_RL33946_e9fdc320f7de166c21205840a6c58117c99ca659.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Transportation", "name": "Transportation" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Warships", "name": "Warships" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Weapons systems", "name": "Weapons systems" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Nuclear warships", "name": "Nuclear warships" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Cruisers", "name": "Cruisers" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc627113/", "id": "RL33946_2008May22", "date": "2008-05-22", "retrieved": "2015-06-15T14:46:40", "title": "Navy Nuclear-Powered Surface Ships: Background, Issues, and Options for Congress", "summary": "This report discusses the possibility of increasing the number of Navy surface ships powered by nuclear energy, including the Navy's planned CG(X) cruiser. The overall report has a specific emphasis on the planned CG(X) cruiser, and how the implementation of this cruiser may be delayed by current budget proposals.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20080522_RL33946_bf103a6726facdf641593800bfe8f58ee06f4d17.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20080522_RL33946_bf103a6726facdf641593800bfe8f58ee06f4d17.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Transportation", "name": "Transportation" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Warships", "name": "Warships" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Weapons systems", "name": "Weapons systems" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Nuclear warships", "name": "Nuclear warships" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Cruisers", "name": "Cruisers" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc805968/", "id": "RL33946_2007Jun13", "date": "2007-06-13", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Navy Nuclear-Powered Surface Ships: Background, Issues, and Options for Congress", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20070613_RL33946_6de321a5ef541cbe3eea291e0954285becb24966.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20070613_RL33946_6de321a5ef541cbe3eea291e0954285becb24966.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc815974/", "id": "RL33946_2007Apr02", "date": "2007-04-02", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Navy Nuclear-Powered Surface Ships: Background, Issues, and Options for Congress", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20070402_RL33946_1f98fd7f365e1f2a7147e2fd4914aa85d9782a7a.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20070402_RL33946_1f98fd7f365e1f2a7147e2fd4914aa85d9782a7a.html" } ], "topics": [] } ], "topics": [ "National Defense" ] }