{ "id": "RL34002", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "number": "RL34002", "active": false, "source": "EveryCRSReport.com, University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "versions": [ { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 428044, "date": "2014-02-07", "retrieved": "2016-04-06T23:07:55.630203", "title": "Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program: Issues and Reform Proposals", "summary": "The Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program provides monthly rental assistance to around 2 million low-income households each year and is the largest (both in terms of people served and annual cost). It is administered at the local level by nearly 2,500 quasi-governmental public housing agencies (PHAs). While some form of Section 8 rental assistance has been in place since the mid-1970s, the modern program was shaped largely by the 1998 public housing reform act (P.L. 105-276). More than a decade later, the Section 8 voucher program has come under new scrutiny, with PHA industry leaders, low-income housing advocates, and some Members of Congress calling for reforms. This report introduces the primary features of the Section 8 voucher program, issues that have arisen, and recent reform proposals.\nMany of the key features of the program have been considered for reform, including its administration; eligible uses of program funds; the method by which tenant income is determined and rents are calculated; who is eligible and what conditions are placed on receipt of assistance; and other features of the program such as portability and quality inspections. Some reform proposals have focused on changing aspects of the program seen as administratively cumbersome and prone to errors. Other proposals have focused on altering the incentives in the program in order to promote policy goals such as homeownership, mobility and family self-sufficiency.\nIssues have also arisen regarding how the Section 8 voucher program is funded, how changes in formula allocations have affected PHAs, and the cost of the program. Partly in response to funding issues, and partly in response to programmatic issues, there have been calls for deregulation of PHAs through expansion of the Moving to Work (MTW) Demonstration.\nSection 8 voucher reform legislation has been considered in every Congress since at least the 108th Congress. One version of this reform legislation, called the Section 8 Voucher Reform Act (SEVRA), was introduced and considered in both the 110th and 111th Congresses (H.R. 1851 and S. 2684, 110th Congress; H.R. 3045, 111th Congress). These bills\u2014which were largely similar, but with some changes\u2014would have made modifications to several features of the Section 8 voucher program, including how income is calculated, how inspections are conducted, and how portability is treated, and they would have adopted a new funding formula. They also would have renamed, expanded, and modified the MTW Demonstration and permitted PHAs to implement alternate rent structures, within limits. A version of SEVRA that is very similar to H.R. 3045 was introduced in the 112th Congress (H.R. 1209) by Representative Waters. However, instead of taking up SEVRA, the House Financial Services Committee held hearings on new draft Section 8 voucher reform legislation, initially called the Section 8 Savings Act (SESA) and then titled the Affordable Housing and Self Sufficiency Improvement Act (AHSSIA). This draft legislation contained many of the same or similar provisions that have been included in SEVRA, including an expansion of a modified version of MTW. The draft AHSSIA was marked-up in subcommittee, but was not considered in full committee. Reform legislation has not been introduced in the 113th Congress.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL34002", "sha1": "f0a14c61c0610ed8862540270ee43778b3c0f9bc", "filename": "files/20140207_RL34002_f0a14c61c0610ed8862540270ee43778b3c0f9bc.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL34002", "sha1": "ccede74ab1e7670b18ab3248aeb951d9a9ef84f0", "filename": "files/20140207_RL34002_ccede74ab1e7670b18ab3248aeb951d9a9ef84f0.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc807793/", "id": "RL34002_2008Apr11", "date": "2008-04-11", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program: Issues and Reform Proposals in the 110th Congress", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20080411_RL34002_778942d1dfbcb01a4b03d6911e2cfeb485099a48.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20080411_RL34002_778942d1dfbcb01a4b03d6911e2cfeb485099a48.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc808337/", "id": "RL34002_2007May16", "date": "2007-05-16", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program: Issues and Reform Proposals in the 110th Congress", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20070516_RL34002_cc69eb9d098f6b1a689e314bce5d565c920b8803.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20070516_RL34002_cc69eb9d098f6b1a689e314bce5d565c920b8803.html" } ], "topics": [] } ], "topics": [ "Domestic Social Policy" ] }