{ "id": "RL34212", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "number": "RL34212", "active": true, "source": "EveryCRSReport.com, University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "versions": [ { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 578779, "date": "2018-02-23", "retrieved": "2018-05-10T11:19:18.597776", "title": "Analysis of the Tax Exclusion for Canceled Mortgage Debt Income", "summary": "A home foreclosure, mortgage default, or mortgage modification can have important tax consequences. As lenders and borrowers work to resolve indebtedness issues, some transactions are resulting in cancellation of debt. Mortgage debt cancellation can occur when lenders restructure loans, reducing principal balances, or sell properties, either in advance, or as a result, of foreclosure proceedings. Historically, if a lender forgives or cancels such debt, tax law has treated it as cancellation of debt (COD) income subject to tax. Exceptions have been available for taxpayers who are insolvent or in bankruptcy, among others\u2014these taxpayers may exclude canceled mortgage debt income under existing law.\nThe Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007 (P.L. 110-142) signed into law on December 20, 2007, temporarily excluded qualified COD income. Thus, the act allowed taxpayers who did not qualify for the existing exceptions to exclude COD income. The provision was effective for debt discharged before January 1, 2010. The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (P.L. 110-343) extended the exclusion of COD income to debt discharged before January 1, 2013. The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 (P.L. 112-240) subsequently extended the exclusion through the end of 2013. The Tax Increase Prevention Act of 2014 (P.L. 113-295) extended the exclusion through the end of 2014. The exclusion was extended again through the end of 2016 by Division Q of P.L. 114-113\u2014the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act (or \u201cPATH\u201d Act). Most recently, the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 (P.L. 115-123) retroactively extended the exclusion through the end of 2017. The extension also allowed for debt discharged after 2017 to be excluded from income if the taxpayer had entered into a binding written agreement before January 1, 2018.\nA rationale for excluding canceled mortgage debt income has focused on minimizing hardship for households in distress. Policymakers have expressed concern that households experiencing hardship and that are in danger of losing their home, presumably as a result of financial distress, should not incur an additional hardship by being taxed on canceled debt income. Some analysts have also drawn a connection between minimizing hardship for individuals and consumer spending; reductions in consumer spending, if significant, can lead to recession.\nAs efforts to minimize the rate of foreclosure are being made, lenders are, in some cases, renegotiating loans with borrowers to keep them in the home. For some policymakers, the exclusion of canceled mortgage debt income may be a necessary step to ensure that homeowner retention efforts are not thwarted by tax policy.\nOpponents of an exclusion for canceled mortgage debt income might argue that the provision would make debt forgiveness more attractive for homeowners, and could encourage homeowners to be less responsible about fulfilling debt obligations.\nThis report will be updated in the event of significant legislative changes.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL34212", "sha1": "c51707eb4f7b60b54b71ba5f6e8f2f8fa4b73408", "filename": "files/20180223_RL34212_c51707eb4f7b60b54b71ba5f6e8f2f8fa4b73408.html", "images": {} }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL34212", "sha1": "1a0acab53480d1a452804341abdf9b83f1b63f0d", "filename": "files/20180223_RL34212_1a0acab53480d1a452804341abdf9b83f1b63f0d.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4918, "name": "Homeownership & Housing Finance" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 448410, "date": "2015-12-30", "retrieved": "2016-04-06T17:37:10.973936", "title": "Analysis of the Tax Exclusion for Canceled Mortgage Debt Income", "summary": "A home foreclosure, mortgage default, or mortgage modification can have important tax consequences. As lenders and borrowers work to resolve indebtedness issues, some transactions are resulting in cancellation of debt. Mortgage debt cancellation can occur when lenders restructure loans, reducing principal balances, or sell properties, either in advance, or as a result, of foreclosure proceedings. Historically, if a lender forgives or cancels such debt, tax law has treated it as cancellation of debt (COD) income subject to tax. Exceptions have been available for taxpayers who are insolvent or in bankruptcy, among others\u2014these taxpayers may exclude canceled mortgage debt income under existing law.\nThe Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007 (P.L. 110-142) signed into law on December 20, 2007, temporarily excluded qualified COD income. Thus, the act allowed taxpayers who did not qualify for the existing exceptions to exclude COD income. The provision was effective for debt discharged before January 1, 2010. The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (P.L. 110-343) extended the exclusion of COD income to debt discharged before January 1, 2013. The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 (P.L. 112-240) subsequently extended the exclusion through the end of 2013. The Tax Increase Prevention Act of 2014 (P.L. 113-295) retroactively extended the exclusion through the end of 2014. Most recently, Division Q of P.L. 114-113\u2014the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act (or \u201cPATH\u201d Act)\u2014extended the exclusion through the end of 2016. The PATH Act also allowed for debt discharged after 2016 to be excluded from income if the taxpayer had entered into a binding written agreement before January 1, 2017.\nA rationale for excluding canceled mortgage debt income has focused on minimizing hardship for households in distress. Policymakers have expressed concern that households experiencing hardship and that are in danger of losing their home, presumably as a result of financial distress, should not incur an additional hardship by being taxed on canceled debt income. Some analysts have also drawn a connection between minimizing hardship for individuals and consumer spending; reductions in consumer spending, if significant, can lead to recession.\nAs efforts to minimize the rate of foreclosure are being made, lenders are, in some cases, renegotiating loans with borrowers to keep them in the home. For some policymakers, the exclusion of canceled mortgage debt income may be a necessary step to ensure that homeowner retention efforts are not thwarted by tax policy.\nOpponents of an exclusion for canceled mortgage debt income might argue that the provision would make debt forgiveness more attractive for homeowners, and could encourage homeowners to be less responsible about fulfilling debt obligations.\nThis report will be updated in the event of significant legislative changes.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL34212", "sha1": "249c4d8e62df3b8fda087d2e34432b19deb36dff", "filename": "files/20151230_RL34212_249c4d8e62df3b8fda087d2e34432b19deb36dff.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL34212", "sha1": "93945dd16069a66f12bb804bd97be54416687c6c", "filename": "files/20151230_RL34212_93945dd16069a66f12bb804bd97be54416687c6c.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4306, "name": "Homeownership Assistance" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc818094/", "id": "RL34212_2015Sep03", "date": "2015-09-03", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Analysis of the Tax Exclusion for Canceled Mortgage Debt Income", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20150903_RL34212_8efedba59eea7bc1d7d1a4c249906bb9738874c3.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20150903_RL34212_8efedba59eea7bc1d7d1a4c249906bb9738874c3.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc807184/", "id": "RL34212_2013Feb12", "date": "2013-02-12", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Analysis of the Tax Exclusion for Canceled Mortgage Debt Income", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20130212_RL34212_db9795fd15f79b041aa237720b102df84edeee10.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20130212_RL34212_db9795fd15f79b041aa237720b102df84edeee10.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc813093/", "id": "RL34212_2008Oct08", "date": "2008-10-08", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Analysis of the Tax Exclusion for Canceled Mortgage Debt Income", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20081008_RL34212_15618338d27a0abb00373fe0b101fa8e579e6dd8.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20081008_RL34212_15618338d27a0abb00373fe0b101fa8e579e6dd8.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc821251/", "id": "RL34212_2007Dec06", "date": "2007-12-06", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Analysis of the Proposed Tax Exclusion for Canceled Mortgage Debt Income", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20071206_RL34212_6cbc664024e536fc42535a01fcc78408ca0c1e45.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20071206_RL34212_6cbc664024e536fc42535a01fcc78408ca0c1e45.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc806481/", "id": "RL34212_2007Nov05", "date": "2007-11-05", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Analysis of the Proposed Tax Exclusion for Canceled Mortgage Debt Income", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20071105_RL34212_0e5efe57d6f9931cfa8ff8d9f6be10881e57b5bf.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20071105_RL34212_0e5efe57d6f9931cfa8ff8d9f6be10881e57b5bf.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc812969/", "id": "RL34212_2007Oct16", "date": "2007-10-16", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Analysis of the Proposed Tax Exclusion for Canceled Mortgage Debt Income", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20071016_RL34212_c2b672dac2a8d2bb8e822bf2304fd1796ab03a64.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20071016_RL34212_c2b672dac2a8d2bb8e822bf2304fd1796ab03a64.html" } ], "topics": [] } ], "topics": [ "Economic Policy" ] }