{
  "id": "RL34449",
  "type": "CRS Report",
  "typeId": "REPORTS",
  "number": "RL34449",
  "active": false,
  "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
  "versions": [
    {
      "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
      "id": 347396,
      "date": "2008-04-09",
      "retrieved": "2016-04-07T03:31:29.096594",
      "title": "Pakistan\u2019s 2008 Elections: Results and Implications for U.S. Policy",
      "summary": "A stable, democratic, prosperous Pakistan actively working to counter Islamist militancy is considered vital to U.S. interests. Pakistan is a key ally in U.S.-led counterterrorism efforts. The history of democracy in Pakistan is a troubled one marked by ongoing tripartite power struggles among presidents, prime ministers, and army chiefs. Military regimes have ruled Pakistan directly for 34 of the country\u2019s 60 years in existence, and most observers agree that Pakistan has no sustained history of effective constitutionalism or parliamentary democracy. In 1999, the democratically elected government of then-Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif was ousted in a bloodless coup led by then-Army Chief Gen. Pervez Musharraf, who later assumed the title of president. In 2002, Supreme Court-ordered parliamentary elections\u2014identified as flawed by opposition parties and international observers\u2014seated a new civilian government, but it remained weak, and Musharraf retained the position as army chief until his November 2007 retirement. In October 2007, Pakistan\u2019s Electoral College reelected Musharraf to a new five-year term in a controversial vote that many called unconstitutional.\nThe Bush Administration urged restoration of full civilian rule in Islamabad and called for the February 2008 national polls to be free, fair, and transparent. U.S. criticism sharpened after President Musharraf\u2019s November 2007 suspension of the Constitution and imposition of emergency rule (nominally lifted six weeks later), and the December 2007 assassination of former Prime Minister and leading opposition figure Benazir Bhutto. To the surprise of nearly all observers, the February elections were relatively free of expected violence. The apparent absence of large-scale election-day rigging allowed opposition parties to decisively defeat Musharraf\u2019s allies in Parliament, where nearly all of the senior incumbents lost their seats. An opposition coalition took power in the National Assembly in late March. Parties opposed to Musharraf also took power in three of the country\u2019s four provincial assemblies. The result led to the Bush Administration\u2019s permanent lifting of coup-related sanctions on aid to Pakistan that had been in place for more than eight years.\nPolitical circumstances in Pakistan remain fluid, however, and the country\u2019s internal security and stability remain seriously threatened. Many observers urge a broad re-evaluation of U.S. policies toward Pakistan as developments create new centers of power in Islamabad. The Bush Administration has vigorously supported the government of President Musharraf, whose credibility and popularity decreased markedly in 2007. The powerful army\u2019s new chief, Gen. Ashfaq Pervez Kiyani, has shown signs of withdrawing the military from a direct role in governance. Moreover, Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gillani may enjoy reinvigorated influence if anticipated reversions to the country\u2019s 1973 Constitution\u2014which empowers Parliament over the presidency\u2014come to pass. As the nature of U.S.-Pakistan relations shifts, potential differences over counterterrorism strategy and over the status of Pakistan\u2019s deposed judges may bedevil bilateral ties. This report reviews the results of Pakistan\u2019s February 2008 vote and discusses some of the implications for U.S. policy. See also CRS Report RL33498, Pakistan-U.S. Relations, and CRS Report RL34240, Pakistan\u2019s Political Crises. This report will not be updated.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORTS",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "encoding": "utf-8",
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL34449",
          "sha1": "c163a009a325f3e74be5c3d7359e7b128dada70a",
          "filename": "files/20080409_RL34449_c163a009a325f3e74be5c3d7359e7b128dada70a.html",
          "images": null
        },
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "encoding": null,
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL34449",
          "sha1": "89106c17512c739a1328e2b80a70a4a0152d3ba0",
          "filename": "files/20080409_RL34449_89106c17512c739a1328e2b80a70a4a0152d3ba0.pdf",
          "images": null
        }
      ],
      "topics": []
    }
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Constitutional Questions",
    "Foreign Affairs",
    "Intelligence and National Security"
  ]
}