{ "id": "RL34534", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "number": "RL34534", "active": false, "source": "EveryCRSReport.com, University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "versions": [ { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 427835, "date": "2014-01-29", "retrieved": "2016-06-21T21:30:31.533819", "title": "Public Financing of Presidential Campaigns: Overview and Analysis", "summary": "The presidential public campaign financing program (the Presidential Election Campaign Fund [PECF]) is funded through \u201ccheckoff\u201d designations on individual income tax returns. Choosing to participate (or not) in the checkoff does not affect one\u2019s tax liability or refund. Candidates who choose to participate in the program may receive taxpayer-funded matches of privately raised funds during primary campaigns, and grants during the general-election contest. Public funds also subsidize nominating conventions. The public financing system has remained largely unchanged since the 1970s. However, there is general agreement that, if the program is to be maintained, updates are necessary to provide greater financial resources and higher spending limits to participants. Some contend that the program should be curtailed or eliminated.\nThis report discusses current controversies and arguments for and against public financing of presidential campaigns, legislative history, elements of the program, taxpayer and candidate participation, financial status of the program, recent legislation, and analysis of various policy proposals. If Congress chooses to alter the program, consensus will be necessary in what has historically been a particularly complex and contentious area of campaign finance policy.\nIn recent Congresses, most legislative activity has concerned efforts to curtail the program. In the 113th Congress, the House has passed legislation (H.R. 2019) to eliminate funding for presidential nominating conventions. The Committee on House Administration has reported two related bills (H.R. 94; H.R. 95). Other bills that would eliminate convention financing include H.R. 260; H.R. 1724; H.R. 2857; and S. 118. Another bill, H.R. 270, would eliminate convention financing but modernize other parts of the presidential public financing program.\nAs this report discusses, various options, each with potential strengths and weaknesses, exist for revisiting the presidential public financing system. Two other CRS reports contain overviews of specific topics addressed in this report. These include CRS Report R41604, Proposals to Eliminate Public Financing of Presidential Campaigns, by R. Sam Garrett; and CRS Report RL34630, Federal Funding of Presidential Nominating Conventions: Overview and Policy Options, by R. Sam Garrett and Shawn Reese.\nThis report will be updated occasionally to reflect major developments.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL34534", "sha1": "c25b170683ee68c0e76a93bbc0609091f6044f2d", "filename": "files/20140129_RL34534_c25b170683ee68c0e76a93bbc0609091f6044f2d.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL34534", "sha1": "0f9f47b8c526029a42bbbf7a974912af0bfb6306", "filename": "files/20140129_RL34534_0f9f47b8c526029a42bbbf7a974912af0bfb6306.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc822548/", "id": "RL34534_2011Nov28", "date": "2011-11-28", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Public Financing of Presidential Campaigns: Overview and Analysis", "summary": "This report discusses current controversies and arguments for and against public financing of presidential campaigns; legislative history; elements of the program; taxpayer and candidate participation; financial status of the program; recent legislation; and analysis of various policy proposals. If Congress chooses to alter the program, consensus will be necessary in what has historically been a particularly complex and contentious area of campaign finance policy.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20111128_RL34534_dba2a987901f4632d2858841c9b7a21e2b72a896.pdf" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Campaign finance reform", "name": "Campaign finance reform" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Elections", "name": "Elections" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Presidential elections", "name": "Presidential elections" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc813452/", "id": "RL34534_2011Jan28", "date": "2011-01-28", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Public Financing of Presidential Campaigns: Overview and Analysis", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20110128_RL34534_a7c888ac8f41adea620e2b324d533462818e4a0f.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20110128_RL34534_a7c888ac8f41adea620e2b324d533462818e4a0f.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc805173/", "id": "RL34534_2008Sep16", "date": "2008-09-16", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Public Financing of Presidential Campaigns: Overview and Analysis", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20080916_RL34534_f18ec65f211ec0768f090994fb4041262732c2e7.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20080916_RL34534_f18ec65f211ec0768f090994fb4041262732c2e7.html" } ], "topics": [] } ], "topics": [] }