{ "id": "RL34579", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "number": "RL34579", "active": false, "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "versions": [ { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 346657, "date": "2008-07-11", "retrieved": "2016-04-07T03:18:24.991191", "title": "Advanced Nuclear Power and Fuel Cycle Technologies: Outlook and Policy Options", "summary": "Current U.S. nuclear energy policy focuses on the near-term construction of improved versions of existing nuclear power plants. All of today\u2019s U.S. nuclear plants are light water reactors (LWRs), which are cooled by ordinary water. Under current policy, the highly radioactive spent nuclear fuel from LWRs is to be permanently disposed of in a deep underground repository.\nThe Bush Administration is also promoting an aggressive U.S. effort to move beyond LWR technology into advanced reactors and fuel cycles. Specifically, the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP), under the Department of Energy (DOE) is developing advanced reprocessing (or recycling) technologies to extract plutonium and uranium from spent nuclear fuel, as well as an advanced reactor that could fully destroy long-lived radioactive isotopes. DOE\u2019s Generation IV Nuclear Energy Systems Initiative is developing other advanced reactor technologies that could be safer than LWRs and produce high-temperature heat to make hydrogen.\nDOE\u2019s advanced nuclear technology programs date back to the early years of the Atomic Energy Commission in the 1940s and 1950s. In particular, it was widely believed that breeder reactors\u2014designed to produce maximum amounts of plutonium from natural uranium\u2014would be necessary for providing sufficient fuel for a large commercial nuclear power industry. Early research was also conducted on a wide variety of other power reactor concepts, some of which are still under active consideration.\nAlthough long a goal of nuclear power proponents, the reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel is also seen as a weapons proliferation risk, because plutonium extracted for new reactor fuel can also be used for nuclear weapons. Therefore, a primary goal of U.S. advanced fuel cycle programs, including GNEP, has been to develop recycling technologies that would not produce pure plutonium that could easily be diverted for weapons use. The \u201cproliferation resistance\u201d of these technologies is subject to considerable debate.\nMuch of the current policy debate over advanced nuclear technologies is being conducted in the appropriations process. For FY2009, the House Appropriations Committee recommended no further funding for GNEP, although it increased funding for the Generation IV program. Typically, the Senate is more supportive of GNEP and reprocessing technologies.\nRecent industry studies conducted for the GNEP program conclude that advanced nuclear technologies will require many decades of government-supported development before they reach the current stage of LWRs. Key questions before Congress are whether the time has come to move beyond laboratory research on advanced nuclear technologies to the next, more expensive, development stages and what role, if any, the federal government should play.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL34579", "sha1": "183fdb201b6da12ea6e0b93bd8eb01aa779bb357", "filename": "files/20080711_RL34579_183fdb201b6da12ea6e0b93bd8eb01aa779bb357.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL34579", "sha1": "ee9c1c57b24fb193368c4c43f2757cb63e168d48", "filename": "files/20080711_RL34579_ee9c1c57b24fb193368c4c43f2757cb63e168d48.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [] } ], "topics": [ "Appropriations", "Energy Policy", "National Defense" ] }