{ "id": "RL34630", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "number": "RL34630", "active": false, "source": "EveryCRSReport.com, University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "versions": [ { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 440140, "date": "2014-01-27", "retrieved": "2016-04-06T23:09:26.397279", "title": "Federal Funding of Presidential Nominating Conventions: Overview and Policy Options", "summary": "This report provides overview and analysis of two recurring questions surrounding the federal government\u2019s role in financing presidential nominating conventions. First, how much public funding supports presidential nominating conventions? Second, what options exist for changing that amount if Congress chooses to do so? In the 113th Congress, the House passed legislation (H.R. 2019) to eliminate nonsecurity funding. The Committee on House Administration reported two other related bills (H.R. 94; H.R. 95). Other bills that would eliminate convention financing include H.R. 260, H.R. 1724, H.R. 2857, and S. 118. Another bill, H.R. 270, would eliminate convention financing but revamp other parts of the presidential public financing program.\nThe 112th Congress also considered legislation to end convention funding. In the Senate, an amendment (containing text from S. 3257) to the 2012 Agriculture Reform, Food and Jobs Act, S. 3240, would have eliminated the convention funding portion of the presidential public financing program. Separately, S. 194 proposed to eliminate the entire public financing program. Another Senate bill, S. 3312, would reform the public financing program partially by eliminating convention funding. Two measures that would have eliminated convention funding passed the House (H.R. 359 and H.R. 3463). Both would have eliminated the entire public financing program. H.R. 5912 would have eliminated only convention financing. H.R. 414 would have revamped the public financing system but eliminated convention financing. These measures do not appear to affect separate security funding discussed in this report. \nThe 112th Congress enacted one law (P.L. 112-55) in FY2012 that affected convention security funding with the appropriation of $100 million for the Democratic and Republican nominating conventions (each was allocated $50 million). This security funding was not provided to party convention committees but to the state and local law enforcement entities assisting in securing the convention sites. \nThe 2012 Democratic and Republican convention committees each received grants, financed with public funds, of approximately $18.2 million (for a total of approximately $36.5 million, as rounded). A total of approximately $133.6 million in federal funds supported the 2008 Democratic and Republican conventions. Such funding was provided through separate federal programs that support public financing of presidential campaigns and convention security. \nSome Members of Congress and others have objected to federal convention funding and have argued that the events should be entirely self-supporting. Others, however, contend that public funding is necessary to avoid real or apparent corruption in this aspect of the presidential nominating process. If Congress decides to revisit convention financing, a variety of policy options discussed in this report might present alternatives to current funding arrangements.\nAdditional discussion of public financing of presidential campaigns appears in CRS Report RL34534, Public Financing of Presidential Campaigns: Overview and Analysis, by R. Sam Garrett and CRS Report R41604, Proposals to Eliminate Public Financing of Presidential Campaigns, by R. Sam Garrett. For additional information on National Special Security Events, which include presidential nominating conventions, see CRS Report RS22754, National Special Security Events, by Shawn Reese. This report will not be updated. Discussion of subsequent developments appears in another CRS product that supersedes this report. For additional detail, see CRS Report R43976, Funding of Presidential Nominating Conventions: An Overview, by R. Sam Garrett and Shawn Reese.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL34630", "sha1": "23233623245399725b80efc707ef9c622e722f4f", "filename": "files/20140127_RL34630_23233623245399725b80efc707ef9c622e722f4f.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL34630", "sha1": "7a3d3b7e4bf0391eaf6e9f862ae285ac23ede0eb", "filename": "files/20140127_RL34630_7a3d3b7e4bf0391eaf6e9f862ae285ac23ede0eb.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc817592/", "id": "RL34630_2012Jun28", "date": "2012-06-28", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Federal Funding of Presidential Nominating Conventions: Overview and Policy Options", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20120628_RL34630_e37da43c165cbebe525e78b73e55abd6c1ca3a02.pdf" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc31486/", "id": "RL34630_2011Jan28", "date": "2011-01-28", "retrieved": "2011-03-09T09:26:47", "title": "Federal Funding of Presidential Nominating Conventions: Overview and Policy Options", "summary": "This report provides an overview and analysis of two recurring questions surrounding the federal government's role in financing presidential nominating conventions. First, how much public funding supports presidential nominating conventions? Second, what options exist for changing that amount if Congress chooses to do so? Both issues have generated controversy in the past and continue to be the subject of debate.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20110128_RL34630_2a1b0686283d918502c722bacc6b4a71fbed9c73.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20110128_RL34630_2a1b0686283d918502c722bacc6b4a71fbed9c73.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Elections", "name": "Elections" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Nominations for office", "name": "Nominations for office" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Presidents", "name": "Presidents" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Political conventions", "name": "Political conventions" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Primaries", "name": "Primaries" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Presidential primaries", "name": "Presidential primaries" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc806588/", "id": "RL34630_2010Mar18", "date": "2010-03-18", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Federal Funding of Presidential Nominating Conventions: Overview and Policy Options", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20100318_RL34630_15e056e46648ac39d2dd979d9bf70ea8eb4ba670.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20100318_RL34630_15e056e46648ac39d2dd979d9bf70ea8eb4ba670.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc463493/", "id": "RL34630_2008Aug22", "date": "2008-08-22", "retrieved": "2014-12-05T09:57:41", "title": "Federal Funding of Presidential Nominating Conventions: Overview and Policy Options", "summary": "This report provides an overview and analysis of two recurring questions surrounding the federal government's role in financing presidential nominating conventions. First, how much public funding supports presidential nominating conventions? Second, what options exist for changing that amount if Congress chooses to do so? Both issues have generated controversy in the past and continue to be the subject of debate.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20080822_RL34630_8bd0d216e0c02f51b4c815a8363facf342922847.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20080822_RL34630_8bd0d216e0c02f51b4c815a8363facf342922847.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Elections", "name": "Elections" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Nominations for office", "name": "Nominations for office" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Presidents", "name": "Presidents" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Political conventions", "name": "Political conventions" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Primaries", "name": "Primaries" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Presidential primaries", "name": "Presidential primaries" } ] } ], "topics": [ "Intelligence and National Security" ] }