{
  "id": "RL34746",
  "type": "CRS Report",
  "typeId": "REPORTS",
  "number": "RL34746",
  "active": false,
  "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
  "versions": [
    {
      "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
      "id": 345755,
      "date": "2008-11-13",
      "retrieved": "2016-04-07T03:02:22.720974",
      "title": "Power Plants: Characteristics and Costs",
      "summary": "This report analyzes the factors that determine the cost of electricity from new power plants. These factors\u2014including construction costs, fuel expense, environmental regulations, and financing costs\u2014can all be affected by government energy, environmental, and economic policies. Government decisions to influence, or not influence, these factors can largely determine the kind of power plants that are built in the future. For example, government policies aimed at reducing the cost of constructing power plants could especially benefit nuclear plants, which are costly to build. Policies that reduce the cost of fossil fuels could benefit natural gas plants, which are inexpensive to build but rely on an expensive fuel.\nThe report provides projections of the possible cost of power from new fossil, nuclear, and renewable plants built in 2015, illustrating how different assumptions, such as for the availability of federal incentives, change the cost rankings of the technologies.\nNone of the projections is intended to be a \u201cmost likely\u201d case. Future uncertainties preclude firm forecasts. The rankings of the technologies by cost are therefore also an approximation and should not be viewed as definitive estimates of the relative cost-competitiveness of each option. The value of the discussion is not as a source of point estimates of future power costs, but as a source of insight into the factors that can determine future outcomes, including factors that can be influenced by the Congress.\nKey observations include the following:\nGovernment incentives can change the relative costs of the generating technologies. For example, federal loan guarantees can turn nuclear power from a high cost technology to a relatively low cost option.\nThe natural gas-fired combined cycle power plant, the most commonly built type of large natural gas plant, is a competitive generating technology under a wide variety of assumptions for fuel price, construction cost, government incentives, and carbon controls. This raises the possibility that power plant developers will continue to follow the pattern of the 1990s and rely heavily on natural gas plants to meet the need for new generating capacity.\nWith current technology, coal-fired power plants using carbon capture equipment are an expensive source of electricity in a carbon control case. Other power sources, such as wind, nuclear, geothermal, and the natural gas combined cycle without capture technology currently appear to be more economical.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORTS",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "encoding": "utf-8",
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL34746",
          "sha1": "e72aa630a6e8d73a5f4e01ed41412b1cf8860252",
          "filename": "files/20081113_RL34746_e72aa630a6e8d73a5f4e01ed41412b1cf8860252.html",
          "images": null
        },
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "encoding": null,
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL34746",
          "sha1": "ff3b4a193ea480b78393241379cb52da8d21c0db",
          "filename": "files/20081113_RL34746_ff3b4a193ea480b78393241379cb52da8d21c0db.pdf",
          "images": null
        }
      ],
      "topics": []
    }
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Economic Policy"
  ]
}