{
  "id": "RS20500",
  "type": "CRS Report",
  "typeId": "REPORTS",
  "number": "RS20500",
  "active": false,
  "source": "EveryCRSReport.com, University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
  "versions": [
    {
      "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
      "id": 102770,
      "date": "2005-02-04",
      "retrieved": "2016-04-07T19:54:26.143029",
      "title": "Medical Records Privacy: Questions and Answers on the HIPAA Rule",
      "summary": "The HIPAA privacy rule gives patients the right of access to their medical information and\nprohibits\nhealth plans and health care providers from using or disclosing individually identifiable health\ninformation without a patient's written authorization except as expressly permitted or required by\nthe rule. Plans and providers are permitted to use and disclose health information for treatment,\npayment, and other routine health care operations and for various specified national priority activities\n(e.g., law enforcement, public health, research). Providers may also share certain information with\nfamily members and others, as long as the patient is given the opportunity to object. Health plans and\nproviders must give enrollees and patients a notice explaining their privacy rights and how their\ninformation will be used. They are also required to have in place reasonable safeguards to protect\nthe privacy of patient information and, in general, must limit the information used or disclosed to\nthe minimum amount necessary to accomplish the intended purpose of the use or disclosure. Entities\nthat fail to comply with the rule are subject to civil and criminal penalties, but patients do not have\nthe right to sue in federal court for violations of the rule. The privacy rule does not preempt, or\noverride, state laws that are more protective of medical records privacy.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORTS",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "encoding": "utf-8",
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RS20500",
          "sha1": "65576d2a1fc05e108b67ff34d1df595313d8b5e3",
          "filename": "files/20050204_RS20500_65576d2a1fc05e108b67ff34d1df595313d8b5e3.html",
          "images": null
        },
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "encoding": null,
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RS20500",
          "sha1": "a94dc0c82ad99f38248263a7918753dddf340a2a",
          "filename": "files/20050204_RS20500_a94dc0c82ad99f38248263a7918753dddf340a2a.pdf",
          "images": null
        }
      ],
      "topics": []
    },
    {
      "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
      "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs5751/",
      "id": "RS20500_2004Mar10",
      "date": "2004-03-10",
      "retrieved": "2005-06-10T22:15:24",
      "title": "Medical Records Privacy: Questions and Answers on the HIPAA Final Rule",
      "summary": "This report discusses the issue facing Congress on whether to continue to support the executive branch\u2019s prosecution of medical marijuana patients and their providers, in accordance with marijuana\u2019s status as a Schedule I drug under the Controlled Substances Act, or whether to relax federal marijuana prohibition enough to permit the medical use of botanical cannabis products by seriously ill persons, especially in states that have created medical marijuana programs under state law.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORT",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "filename": "files/20040310_RS20500_76db92df259058eef225e21524e826bc5b906876.pdf"
        },
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "filename": "files/20040310_RS20500_76db92df259058eef225e21524e826bc5b906876.html"
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Civil liberties",
          "name": "Civil liberties"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Government regulation",
          "name": "Government regulation"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Patients' rights",
          "name": "Patients' rights"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Right of privacy",
          "name": "Right of privacy"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Economic policy",
          "name": "Economic policy"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Medicine",
          "name": "Medicine"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
      "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs3929/",
      "id": "RS20500_2003Jun11",
      "date": "2003-06-11",
      "retrieved": "2005-06-10T22:15:09",
      "title": "Medical Records Privacy: Questions and Answers on the HIPAA Final Rule",
      "summary": "This report discusses the issue facing Congress on whether to continue to support the executive branch\u2019s prosecution of medical marijuana patients and their providers, in accordance with marijuana\u2019s status as a Schedule I drug under the Controlled Substances Act, or whether to relax federal marijuana prohibition enough to permit the medical use of botanical cannabis products by seriously ill persons, especially in states that have created medical marijuana programs under state law.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORT",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "filename": "files/20030611_RS20500_0db35deb23c17f736e2c283d19ea538383af01cd.pdf"
        },
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "filename": "files/20030611_RS20500_0db35deb23c17f736e2c283d19ea538383af01cd.html"
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Civil liberties",
          "name": "Civil liberties"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Government regulation",
          "name": "Government regulation"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Patients' rights",
          "name": "Patients' rights"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Right of privacy",
          "name": "Right of privacy"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Economic policy",
          "name": "Economic policy"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Medicine",
          "name": "Medicine"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
      "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs3928/",
      "id": "RS20500_2003Jan03",
      "date": "2003-01-03",
      "retrieved": "2005-06-10T22:14:55",
      "title": "Medical Records Privacy: Questions and Answers on the HIPAA Final Rule",
      "summary": "This report discusses the issue facing Congress on whether to continue to support the executive branch\u2019s prosecution of medical marijuana patients and their providers, in accordance with marijuana\u2019s status as a Schedule I drug under the Controlled Substances Act, or whether to relax federal marijuana prohibition enough to permit the medical use of botanical cannabis products by seriously ill persons, especially in states that have created medical marijuana programs under state law.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORT",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "filename": "files/20030103_RS20500_0d1a804d6ca0663890010cb4ffdbdaf897b040a2.pdf"
        },
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "filename": "files/20030103_RS20500_0d1a804d6ca0663890010cb4ffdbdaf897b040a2.html"
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Civil liberties",
          "name": "Civil liberties"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Government regulation",
          "name": "Government regulation"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Patients' rights",
          "name": "Patients' rights"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Right of privacy",
          "name": "Right of privacy"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Economic policy",
          "name": "Economic policy"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Medicine",
          "name": "Medicine"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
      "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2251/",
      "id": "RS20500_2002Oct03",
      "date": "2002-10-03",
      "retrieved": "2005-06-10T22:14:40",
      "title": "Medical Records Privacy: Questions and Answers on the HIPAA Final Rule",
      "summary": "This report discusses the issue facing Congress on whether to continue to support the executive branch\u2019s prosecution of medical marijuana patients and their providers, in accordance with marijuana\u2019s status as a Schedule I drug under the Controlled Substances Act, or whether to relax federal marijuana prohibition enough to permit the medical use of botanical cannabis products by seriously ill persons, especially in states that have created medical marijuana programs under state law.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORT",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "filename": "files/20021003_RS20500_e66215ea71e53c4b2b783684f74f2be501eb797a.pdf"
        },
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "filename": "files/20021003_RS20500_e66215ea71e53c4b2b783684f74f2be501eb797a.html"
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Civil liberties",
          "name": "Civil liberties"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Government regulation",
          "name": "Government regulation"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Patients' rights",
          "name": "Patients' rights"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Right of privacy",
          "name": "Right of privacy"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Economic policy",
          "name": "Economic policy"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Medicine",
          "name": "Medicine"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
      "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs1458/",
      "id": "RS20500_2001Sep10",
      "date": "2001-09-10",
      "retrieved": "2005-06-10T22:14:25",
      "title": "Medical Records Privacy: Questions and Answers on the HIPAA Final Rule",
      "summary": "This report discusses the issue facing Congress on whether to continue to support the executive branch\u2019s prosecution of medical marijuana patients and their providers, in accordance with marijuana\u2019s status as a Schedule I drug under the Controlled Substances Act, or whether to relax federal marijuana prohibition enough to permit the medical use of botanical cannabis products by seriously ill persons, especially in states that have created medical marijuana programs under state law.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORT",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "filename": "files/20010910_RS20500_dcc5745014c34f5d89ad8cd3011e991bd0f857e1.pdf"
        },
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "filename": "files/20010910_RS20500_dcc5745014c34f5d89ad8cd3011e991bd0f857e1.html"
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Civil liberties",
          "name": "Civil liberties"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Government regulation",
          "name": "Government regulation"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Patients' rights",
          "name": "Patients' rights"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Right of privacy",
          "name": "Right of privacy"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Economic policy",
          "name": "Economic policy"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Medicine",
          "name": "Medicine"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "topics": []
}