{
  "id": "RS21105",
  "type": "CRS Report",
  "typeId": "REPORTS",
  "number": "RS21105",
  "active": false,
  "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
  "versions": [
    {
      "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
      "id": 102483,
      "date": "2002-01-15",
      "retrieved": "2016-05-24T20:17:12.784941",
      "title": "The Americans with Disabilities Act: Toyota Motor Manufacturing v. Williams",
      "summary": "The Supreme Court, in  Toyota Motor Manufacturing v. Williams,  held that to be an\nindividual with\na disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) an individual must have substantial\nlimitations on abilities that are central to daily life, rather than only to those abilities used in the\nworkplace. In an unanimous opinion written by Justice O'Connor, the Court interpreted the\ndefinition of individual with disability narrowly to exclude individuals who are limited only in the\nperformance of manual tasks associated with their job. This report will briefly discuss\n Williams  and\nits implications for the ADA. For a more detailed discussion of the ADA see  CRS Report 98-921 ,\n The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): Statutory Language and Recent Issues.  \nThis report will\nnot be updated.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORTS",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "encoding": null,
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RS21105",
          "sha1": "3bce8756973f7542cfecbf766bda29c05bef44a0",
          "filename": "files/20020115_RS21105_3bce8756973f7542cfecbf766bda29c05bef44a0.pdf",
          "images": null
        },
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "filename": "files/20020115_RS21105_3bce8756973f7542cfecbf766bda29c05bef44a0.html"
        }
      ],
      "topics": []
    }
  ],
  "topics": [
    "American Law"
  ]
}