{ "id": "RS22272", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "number": "RS22272", "active": false, "source": "EveryCRSReport.com, University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "versions": [ { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 343090, "date": "2009-01-26", "retrieved": "2016-04-07T02:52:29.788687", "title": "Campaign Finance: Regulating Political Communications on the Internet", "summary": "The Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) regulates \u201cfederal election activity,\u201d which is defined to include a \u201cpublic communication\u201d (i.e., a broadcast, cable, satellite, newspaper, magazine, outdoor advertising facility, mass mailing, or telephone bank communication made to the general public) or \u201cany other form of general public political advertising.\u201d In 2006, in response to a federal district court decision, the FEC promulgated regulations amending the definition of \u201cpublic communication\u201d to include paid Internet advertisements placed on another individual or entity\u2019s website. As a result, a key element of online political activity\u2014paid political advertising\u2014is subject to federal campaign finance law and regulations.\nDuring the 110th Congress, the regulation of political communications on the Internet was not the subject of major legislative action. H.R. 894 (Price, NC) would have extended \u201cstand by your ad\u201d disclaimer requirements to Internet communications, among others. H.R. 5699 (Hensarling) would have exempted from treatment as a contribution or expenditure any uncompensated Internet services by individuals and certain corporations. Similar legislation has not yet been introduced in the 111th Congress. This report will be updated in the event of major legislative, regulatory, or legal developments.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RS22272", "sha1": "2a986f35a51634f4042954e812bd6b553e3ccf7c", "filename": "files/20090126_RS22272_2a986f35a51634f4042954e812bd6b553e3ccf7c.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RS22272", "sha1": "406b4e64f0b90b1635f734a31e11a5f97caf770a", "filename": "files/20090126_RS22272_406b4e64f0b90b1635f734a31e11a5f97caf770a.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc815559/", "id": "RS22272_2008Apr16", "date": "2008-04-16", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Campaign Finance Reform: Regulating Political Communications on the Internet", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20080416_RS22272_5aaed1d339559b48a86b5f458944bb1e8866186c.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20080416_RS22272_5aaed1d339559b48a86b5f458944bb1e8866186c.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc812555/", "id": "RS22272_2006Mar23", "date": "2006-03-23", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Campaign Finance Reform: Regulating Political Communications on the Internet", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20060323_RS22272_d41446b5220c23db0451e89c15a9b8f5175d80dd.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20060323_RS22272_d41446b5220c23db0451e89c15a9b8f5175d80dd.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs7556/", "id": "RS22272 2005-09-20", "date": "2005-09-20", "retrieved": "2005-10-24T11:37:51", "title": "Campaign Finance Reform: Regulating Political Communications on the Internet", "summary": "In October 2002, the Federal Election Commission (FEC) promulgated regulations exempting from the definition of \u201cpublic communication\u201d those communications that are made over the Internet. In response to the FEC\u2019s final rules, the two primary House sponsors of BCRA filed suit in U.S. district court against the FEC seeking to invalidate the regulations as opening a new avenue for circumvention of federal campaign finance law. In September 2004, in Shays v. FEC, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia overturned some of the FEC\u2019s new regulations. In response to the district court\u2019s decision, in April 2005, the FEC published proposed new rules in order to conform to the Shays ruling. The proposed regulations reflect an attempt by the FEC to leave web logs, or \u201cblogs,\u201d created and wholly maintained by individuals, free of regulations under FECA, while extending limited regulation only to uses of the Internet involving substantial monetary transactions.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20050920_RS22272_132580c44194084d05becd278fe7de77b8f6889a.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20050920_RS22272_132580c44194084d05becd278fe7de77b8f6889a.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Elections", "name": "Elections" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Internet", "name": "Internet" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Political advertising", "name": "Political advertising" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Campaign finance reform", "name": "Campaign finance reform" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Telecommunications", "name": "Telecommunications" } ] } ], "topics": [] }