{
  "id": "RS22313",
  "type": "CRS Report",
  "typeId": "REPORTS",
  "number": "RS22313",
  "active": false,
  "source": "EveryCRSReport.com, University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
  "versions": [
    {
      "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
      "id": 310201,
      "date": "2005-11-22",
      "retrieved": "2016-04-07T19:26:38.116029",
      "title": "Energy and Mineral Issues in the FY2006 Budget Reconciliation Bill",
      "summary": "Several resource issues that are designed to generate revenue for the federal Treasury have been\nproposed for the FY2006 budget reconciliation bill. The most controversial of these provisions\nrecommended by the House Resources Committee and Senate Energy and Natural Resources\nCommittee would open part of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) for oil and gas\ndevelopment. The House panel also approved a provision that would allow coastal states to\n\u201copt out\u201d\nof the current offshore oil and gas development moratoria, increase fees for hardrock mining and\npatents, dispose of certain federal lands, and begin an oil shale and tar sands leasing program. \n The House Rules Committee, however, approved a closed rule ( H.Res. 542 ) for\nthe budget reconciliation package, including an amendment that would remove from the bill, the\nANWR and OCS provisions described above. On November 18, 2005, the House approved its\nversion of the budget bill,  H.R. 4241 , passed as  S. 1932  (without the\nANWR and OCS provisions), by a vote of 217-215. \n The Congressional Budget Office estimates offsetting receipts from resource development on\nfederal lands in the House-approved bill to be $286 million and in the Senate version to be $2.66\nbillion between 2006-2010. This report will be updated.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORTS",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "encoding": "utf-8",
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RS22313",
          "sha1": "204ebc8a9e318e2762d97bc0c57f7b2cb571f356",
          "filename": "files/20051122_RS22313_204ebc8a9e318e2762d97bc0c57f7b2cb571f356.html",
          "images": null
        },
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "encoding": null,
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RS22313",
          "sha1": "7b3608556f2ee4622a07e3c2d02c5a5f175afa54",
          "filename": "files/20051122_RS22313_7b3608556f2ee4622a07e3c2d02c5a5f175afa54.pdf",
          "images": null
        }
      ],
      "topics": []
    },
    {
      "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
      "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs7960/",
      "id": "RS22313 2005-11-02",
      "date": "2005-11-02",
      "retrieved": "2005-12-21T17:06:38",
      "title": "Energy and Mineral Issues in the FY2006 Budget Reconciliation Bill",
      "summary": "Several resource issues that are designed to generate revenue for the federal Treasury have been proposed for the FY2006 budget reconciliation bill. The most controversial of these provisions recommended by the House Resources Committee and Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee would open part of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) for oil and gas development. The House panel also approved a provision that would allow coastal states to \u201copt out\u201d of the current offshore oil and gas development moratoria, increase fees for hardrock mining and patents, dispose of certain federal lands, and begin an oil shale and tar sands leasing program.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORT",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "filename": "files/20051102_RS22313_108e82ce181553e720227990698db0dfb56085c0.pdf"
        },
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "filename": "files/20051102_RS22313_108e82ce181553e720227990698db0dfb56085c0.html"
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Budgets",
          "name": "Budgets"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Petroleum",
          "name": "Petroleum"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Mines and mineral resources",
          "name": "Mines and mineral resources"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Budget reconciliation",
          "name": "Budget reconciliation"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Energy",
          "name": "Energy"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Natural resources",
          "name": "Natural resources"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "topics": []
}