{ "id": "RS22373", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "number": "RS22373", "active": true, "source": "EveryCRSReport.com, CRSReports.Congress.gov, University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "versions": [ { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 611574, "date": "2019-12-17", "retrieved": "2019-12-20T16:34:05.961192", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "In the years following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the Navy has carried out a variety of irregular warfare (IW) and counterterrorism (CT) activities. Among the most readily visible of these were operations carried out by Navy sailors serving ashore in the Middle East and Afghanistan, as well as the May 1-2, 2011, U.S. military operation in Abbottabad, Pakistan, that killed Osama bin Laden.\nDuring these years, the Navy took certain actions intended to improve its IW capabilities. For example, the Navy established the Navy Expeditionary Combat Command (NECC) informally in October 2005 and formally in January 2006. NECC consolidated and facilitated the expansion of a number of Navy organizations that have a role in IW operations. The Navy also established the Navy Irregular Warfare Office in July 2008, published a vision statement for irregular warfare in January 2010, and established \u201ca community of interest\u201d (COI) to develop and advance ideas, collaboration, and advocacy related to IW in December 2010.\nThe Navy during these years also reestablished its riverine force and initiated The Global Maritime Partnership, which was a U.S. Navy initiative to achieve an enhanced degree of cooperation between the U.S. Navy and foreign navies, coast guards, and maritime police forces, for the purpose of ensuring global maritime security against common threats. In addition, the Navy operated the Southern Partnership Station (SPS) and the Africa Partnership Station (APS), which were Navy ships, such as amphibious ships or high-speed sealift ships, that deployed to the Caribbean and to waters off Africa, respectively, to support U.S. Navy engagement with countries in those regions, particularly for purposes of building security partnerships with those countries and for increasing the capabilities of those countries for performing maritime-security operations.\nThe Navy\u2019s current IW and CT activities pose a number of potential oversight issues for Congress, including how much emphasis to place on IW and CT activities in Navy budgets, particularly in a context of constraints on Navy budgets and Navy desires to devote resources to developing \u201chigh end\u201d combat capabilities for countering improved conventional military capabilities of countries such as China and Russia.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/RS22373", "sha1": "c94c35e57426b141961324bcca6845f9e393e888", "filename": "files/20191217_RS22373_c94c35e57426b141961324bcca6845f9e393e888.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/1.png": "files/20191217_RS22373_images_4c15426a44565f8941b7b173be44718654cc5060.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/0.png": "files/20191217_RS22373_images_ac78eb8890b4ab2fdc69d7d2f853b8b6bebae0b7.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/6.png": "files/20191217_RS22373_images_da8b1004c13d077f48d8b764367da2ac25a0d7c2.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/5.png": "files/20191217_RS22373_images_e9873c76f3346f2676d3248c536b236e8b1074fa.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/2.png": "files/20191217_RS22373_images_c03d489555992707979c0d16d9747015bdda5232.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/4.png": "files/20191217_RS22373_images_130f889aa34434e9a7e51107a80acb4eea44dc59.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/3.png": "files/20191217_RS22373_images_43a63e6ff085c2d26298ea1dd926ce8c8daa0e1f.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RS22373", "sha1": "84c8d5e97368a7c40592b8cd1d71591b1505bbb7", "filename": "files/20191217_RS22373_84c8d5e97368a7c40592b8cd1d71591b1505bbb7.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4903, "name": "Strategy, Operations, & Emerging Threats" } ] }, { "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "retrieved": "2020-09-07T12:24:47.117193", "id": "RS22373_125_2019-12-13", "formats": [ { "filename": "files/2019-12-13_RS22373_9c3c924dfec687c1db40a8c468bdfa5a95d5ba53.pdf", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RS/RS22373/125", "sha1": "9c3c924dfec687c1db40a8c468bdfa5a95d5ba53" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2019-12-13_RS22373_9c3c924dfec687c1db40a8c468bdfa5a95d5ba53.html" } ], "date": "2019-12-13", "summary": null, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "typeId": "RS", "active": true, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=RS22373", "type": "CRS Report" }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 605211, "date": "2019-09-18", "retrieved": "2019-09-19T22:19:16.601298", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "In the years following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the Navy has carried out a variety of irregular warfare (IW) and counterterrorism (CT) activities. Among the most readily visible of these were operations carried out by Navy sailors serving ashore in the Middle East and Afghanistan, as well as the May 1-2, 2011, U.S. military operation in Abbottabad, Pakistan, that killed Osama bin Laden.\nDuring these years, the Navy took certain actions intended to improve its IW capabilities. For example, the Navy established the Navy Expeditionary Combat Command (NECC) informally in October 2005 and formally in January 2006. NECC consolidated and facilitated the expansion of a number of Navy organizations that have a role in IW operations. The Navy also established the Navy Irregular Warfare Office in July 2008, published a vision statement for irregular warfare in January 2010, and established \u201ca community of interest\u201d (COI) to develop and advance ideas, collaboration, and advocacy related to IW in December 2010.\nThe Navy during these years also reestablished its riverine force and initiated The Global Maritime Partnership, which was a U.S. Navy initiative to achieve an enhanced degree of cooperation between the U.S. Navy and foreign navies, coast guards, and maritime police forces, for the purpose of ensuring global maritime security against common threats. In addition, the Navy operated the Southern Partnership Station (SPS) and the Africa Partnership Station (APS), which were Navy ships, such as amphibious ships or high-speed sealift ships, that deployed to the Caribbean and to waters off Africa, respectively, to support U.S. Navy engagement with countries in those regions, particularly for purposes of building security partnerships with those countries and for increasing the capabilities of those countries for performing maritime-security operations.\nThe Navy\u2019s current IW and CT activities pose a number of potential oversight issues for Congress, including how much emphasis to place on IW and CT activities in Navy budgets, particularly in a context of constraints on Navy budgets and Navy desires to devote resources to developing \u201chigh end\u201d combat capabilities for countering improved conventional military capabilities of countries such as China and Russia.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/RS22373", "sha1": "38f78b581f3c02c578245cb63a73d55f88772699", "filename": "files/20190918_RS22373_38f78b581f3c02c578245cb63a73d55f88772699.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/1.png": "files/20190918_RS22373_images_4c15426a44565f8941b7b173be44718654cc5060.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/0.png": "files/20190918_RS22373_images_ac78eb8890b4ab2fdc69d7d2f853b8b6bebae0b7.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/6.png": "files/20190918_RS22373_images_da8b1004c13d077f48d8b764367da2ac25a0d7c2.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/5.png": "files/20190918_RS22373_images_e9873c76f3346f2676d3248c536b236e8b1074fa.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/2.png": "files/20190918_RS22373_images_c03d489555992707979c0d16d9747015bdda5232.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/4.png": "files/20190918_RS22373_images_130f889aa34434e9a7e51107a80acb4eea44dc59.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/3.png": "files/20190918_RS22373_images_43a63e6ff085c2d26298ea1dd926ce8c8daa0e1f.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RS22373", "sha1": "f06cbafb2e99c2ea7c9fcb0f6fc9c749560ef3a3", "filename": "files/20190918_RS22373_f06cbafb2e99c2ea7c9fcb0f6fc9c749560ef3a3.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4903, "name": "Strategy, Operations, & Emerging Threats" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 600833, "date": "2019-06-21", "retrieved": "2019-07-02T22:10:58.561738", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "In the years following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the Navy has carried out a variety of irregular warfare (IW) and counterterrorism (CT) activities. Among the most readily visible of these were operations carried out by Navy sailors serving ashore in the Middle East and Afghanistan, as well as the May 1-2, 2011, U.S. military operation in Abbottabad, Pakistan, that killed Osama bin Laden.\nDuring these years, the Navy took certain actions intended to improve its IW capabilities. For example, the Navy established the Navy Expeditionary Combat Command (NECC) informally in October 2005 and formally in January 2006. NECC consolidated and facilitated the expansion of a number of Navy organizations that have a role in IW operations. The Navy also established the Navy Irregular Warfare Office in July 2008, published a vision statement for irregular warfare in January 2010, and established \u201ca community of interest\u201d (COI) to develop and advance ideas, collaboration, and advocacy related to IW in December 2010.\nThe Navy during these years also reestablished its riverine force and initiated The Global Maritime Partnership, which was a U.S. Navy initiative to achieve an enhanced degree of cooperation between the U.S. Navy and foreign navies, coast guards, and maritime police forces, for the purpose of ensuring global maritime security against common threats. In addition, the Navy operated the Southern Partnership Station (SPS) and the Africa Partnership Station (APS), which were Navy ships, such as amphibious ships or high-speed sealift ships, that deployed to the Caribbean and to waters off Africa, respectively, to support U.S. Navy engagement with countries in those regions, particularly for purposes of building security partnerships with those countries and for increasing the capabilities of those countries for performing maritime-security operations.\nThe Navy\u2019s current IW and CT activities pose a number of potential oversight issues for Congress, including how much emphasis to place on IW and CT activities in Navy budgets, particularly in a context of constraints on Navy budgets and Navy desires to devote resources to developing \u201chigh end\u201d combat capabilities for countering improved conventional military capabilities of countries such as China and Russia.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/RS22373", "sha1": "b8c64964fcbf373b5cd3e8e150c34e09e24b3327", "filename": "files/20190621_RS22373_b8c64964fcbf373b5cd3e8e150c34e09e24b3327.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/1.png": "files/20190621_RS22373_images_4c15426a44565f8941b7b173be44718654cc5060.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/0.png": "files/20190621_RS22373_images_ac78eb8890b4ab2fdc69d7d2f853b8b6bebae0b7.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/6.png": "files/20190621_RS22373_images_da8b1004c13d077f48d8b764367da2ac25a0d7c2.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/5.png": "files/20190621_RS22373_images_e9873c76f3346f2676d3248c536b236e8b1074fa.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/2.png": "files/20190621_RS22373_images_c03d489555992707979c0d16d9747015bdda5232.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/4.png": "files/20190621_RS22373_images_130f889aa34434e9a7e51107a80acb4eea44dc59.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/3.png": "files/20190621_RS22373_images_43a63e6ff085c2d26298ea1dd926ce8c8daa0e1f.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RS22373", "sha1": "3b5ae7bea23768ee6e78832d95090faa8aceaff6", "filename": "files/20190621_RS22373_3b5ae7bea23768ee6e78832d95090faa8aceaff6.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4903, "name": "Strategy, Operations, & Emerging Threats" } ] }, { "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "retrieved": "2020-09-07T12:24:47.116452", "id": "RS22373_121_2019-06-19", "formats": [ { "filename": "files/2019-06-19_RS22373_1094b2736613d497dac46e26468493da649dd6d8.pdf", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RS/RS22373/121", "sha1": "1094b2736613d497dac46e26468493da649dd6d8" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2019-06-19_RS22373_1094b2736613d497dac46e26468493da649dd6d8.html" } ], "date": "2019-06-19", "summary": null, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "typeId": "RS", "active": true, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=RS22373", "type": "CRS Report" }, { "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "retrieved": "2020-09-07T12:24:47.116216", "id": "RS22373_120_2019-06-07", "formats": [ { "filename": "files/2019-06-07_RS22373_3c94aaf00921088c53591f62f7cbb78bd2e33ce1.pdf", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RS/RS22373/120", "sha1": "3c94aaf00921088c53591f62f7cbb78bd2e33ce1" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2019-06-07_RS22373_3c94aaf00921088c53591f62f7cbb78bd2e33ce1.html" } ], "date": "2019-06-07", "summary": null, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "typeId": "RS", "active": true, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=RS22373", "type": "CRS Report" }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 597214, "date": "2019-04-25", "retrieved": "2019-05-03T14:14:35.096348", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "In the years following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the Navy has carried out a variety of irregular warfare (IW) and counterterrorism (CT) activities. Among the most readily visible of these were operations carried out by Navy sailors serving ashore in the Middle East and Afghanistan, as well as the May 1-2, 2011, U.S. military operation in Abbottabad, Pakistan, that killed Osama bin Laden.\nDuring these years, the Navy took certain actions intended to improve its IW capabilities. For example, the Navy established the Navy Expeditionary Combat Command (NECC) informally in October 2005 and formally in January 2006. NECC consolidated and facilitated the expansion of a number of Navy organizations that have a role in IW operations. The Navy also established the Navy Irregular Warfare Office in July 2008, published a vision statement for irregular warfare in January 2010, and established \u201ca community of interest\u201d (COI) to develop and advance ideas, collaboration, and advocacy related to IW in December 2010.\nThe Navy during these years also reestablished its riverine force and initiated The Global Maritime Partnership, which was a U.S. Navy initiative to achieve an enhanced degree of cooperation between the U.S. Navy and foreign navies, coast guards, and maritime police forces, for the purpose of ensuring global maritime security against common threats. In addition, the Navy operated the Southern Partnership Station (SPS) and the Africa Partnership Station (APS), which were Navy ships, such as amphibious ships or high-speed sealift ships, that deployed to the Caribbean and to waters off Africa, respectively, to support U.S. Navy engagement with countries in those regions, particularly for purposes of building security partnerships with those countries and for increasing the capabilities of those countries for performing maritime-security operations.\nThe Navy\u2019s current IW and CT activities pose a number of potential oversight issues for Congress, including how much emphasis to place on IW and CT activities in Navy budgets, particularly in a context of constraints on Navy budgets and Navy desires to devote resources to developing \u201chigh end\u201d combat capabilities for countering improved conventional military capabilities of countries such as China and Russia.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/RS22373", "sha1": "d7a08626578a235dd8dfaa64b6ed9b58db31ff5a", "filename": "files/20190425_RS22373_d7a08626578a235dd8dfaa64b6ed9b58db31ff5a.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/1.png": "files/20190425_RS22373_images_4c15426a44565f8941b7b173be44718654cc5060.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/0.png": "files/20190425_RS22373_images_ac78eb8890b4ab2fdc69d7d2f853b8b6bebae0b7.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/6.png": "files/20190425_RS22373_images_da8b1004c13d077f48d8b764367da2ac25a0d7c2.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/5.png": "files/20190425_RS22373_images_e9873c76f3346f2676d3248c536b236e8b1074fa.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/2.png": "files/20190425_RS22373_images_c03d489555992707979c0d16d9747015bdda5232.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/4.png": "files/20190425_RS22373_images_130f889aa34434e9a7e51107a80acb4eea44dc59.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/3.png": "files/20190425_RS22373_images_43a63e6ff085c2d26298ea1dd926ce8c8daa0e1f.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RS22373", "sha1": "35962701c6059b2af41d017f97f6f86bbe0497c9", "filename": "files/20190425_RS22373_35962701c6059b2af41d017f97f6f86bbe0497c9.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4903, "name": "Strategy, Operations, & Emerging Threats" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 586456, "date": "2018-10-19", "retrieved": "2018-10-22T22:02:27.995613", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "In the years following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the Navy has carried out a variety of irregular warfare (IW) and counterterrorism (CT) activities. Among the most readily visible of these were operations carried out by Navy sailors serving ashore in the Middle East and Afghanistan, and the May 1-2, 2011, U.S. military operation in Abbottabad, Pakistan, that killed Osama bin Laden.\nDuring these years, the Navy took certain actions intended to improve its IW capabilities. For example, the Navy established the Navy Expeditionary Combat Command (NECC) informally in October 2005 and formally in January 2006. NECC consolidated and facilitated the expansion of a number of Navy organizations that have a role in IW operations. The Navy also established the Navy Irregular Warfare Office in July 2008, published a vision statement for irregular warfare in January 2010, and established \u201ca community of interest\u201d (COI) to develop and advance ideas, collaboration, and advocacy related to IW in December 2010.\nThe Navy during these years also reestablished its riverine force and initiated The Global Maritime Partnership, which was a U.S. Navy initiative to achieve an enhanced degree of cooperation between the U.S. Navy and foreign navies, coast guards, and maritime police forces, for the purpose of ensuring global maritime security against common threats. In addition, the Navy operated the Southern Partnership Station (SPS) and the Africa Partnership Station (APS), which were Navy ships, such as amphibious ships or high-speed sealift ships, that deployed to the Caribbean and to waters off Africa, respectively, to support U.S. Navy engagement with countries in those regions, particularly for purposes of building security partnerships with those countries and for increasing the capabilities of those countries for performing maritime-security operations.\nThe Navy\u2019s current IW and CT activities pose a number of potential oversight issues for Congress, including how much emphasis to place on IW and CT activities in Navy budgets, particularly in a context of constraints on Navy budgets and Navy desires to devote resources to developing \u201chigh end\u201d combat capabilities for countering improved conventional military capabilities of countries such as China and Russia.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RS22373", "sha1": "b0d8cf53b2925e0bae1a62ae9bdf8800597ef062", "filename": "files/20181019_RS22373_b0d8cf53b2925e0bae1a62ae9bdf8800597ef062.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/1.png": "files/20181019_RS22373_images_4c15426a44565f8941b7b173be44718654cc5060.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/2.png": "files/20181019_RS22373_images_c03d489555992707979c0d16d9747015bdda5232.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/0.png": "files/20181019_RS22373_images_ac78eb8890b4ab2fdc69d7d2f853b8b6bebae0b7.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/6.png": "files/20181019_RS22373_images_da8b1004c13d077f48d8b764367da2ac25a0d7c2.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/5.png": "files/20181019_RS22373_images_e9873c76f3346f2676d3248c536b236e8b1074fa.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/3.png": "files/20181019_RS22373_images_43a63e6ff085c2d26298ea1dd926ce8c8daa0e1f.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/4.png": "files/20181019_RS22373_images_130f889aa34434e9a7e51107a80acb4eea44dc59.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RS22373", "sha1": "5bc2a49ad56510b50f69979e28fe7ae6c979daf8", "filename": "files/20181019_RS22373_5bc2a49ad56510b50f69979e28fe7ae6c979daf8.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4903, "name": "Strategy, Operations, & Emerging Threats" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 584407, "date": "2018-08-01", "retrieved": "2018-10-05T22:54:42.930934", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "In the years following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the Navy has carried out a variety of irregular warfare (IW) and counterterrorism (CT) activities. Among the most readily visible of these were operations carried out by Navy sailors serving ashore in the Middle East and Afghanistan, and the May 1-2, 2011, U.S. military operation in Abbottabad, Pakistan, that killed Osama bin Laden.\nDuring these years, the Navy took certain actions intended to improve its IW capabilities. For example, the Navy established the Navy Expeditionary Combat Command (NECC) informally in October 2005 and formally in January 2006. NECC consolidated and facilitated the expansion of a number of Navy organizations that have a role in IW operations. The Navy also established the Navy Irregular Warfare Office in July 2008, published a vision statement for irregular warfare in January 2010, and established \u201ca community of interest\u201d (COI) to develop and advance ideas, collaboration, and advocacy related to IW in December 2010.\nThe Navy during these years also reestablished its riverine force and initiated The Global Maritime Partnership, which was a U.S. Navy initiative to achieve an enhanced degree of cooperation between the U.S. Navy and foreign navies, coast guards, and maritime police forces, for the purpose of ensuring global maritime security against common threats. In addition, the Navy operated the Southern Partnership Station (SPS) and the Africa Partnership Station (APS), which were Navy ships, such as amphibious ships or high-speed sealift ships, that deployed to the Caribbean and to waters off Africa, respectively, to support U.S. Navy engagement with countries in those regions, particularly for purposes of building security partnerships with those countries and for increasing the capabilities of those countries for performing maritime-security operations.\nThe Navy\u2019s current IW and CT activities pose a number of potential oversight issues for Congress, including how much emphasis to place on IW and CT activities in Navy budgets, particularly in a context of constraints on Navy budgets and Navy desires to devote resources to developing \u201chigh end\u201d combat capabilities for countering improved conventional military capabilities of countries such as China and Russia.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RS22373", "sha1": "03b657f72a47989cc64092a5311c5c9e9ea39582", "filename": "files/20180801_RS22373_03b657f72a47989cc64092a5311c5c9e9ea39582.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/1.png": "files/20180801_RS22373_images_4c15426a44565f8941b7b173be44718654cc5060.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/0.png": "files/20180801_RS22373_images_ac78eb8890b4ab2fdc69d7d2f853b8b6bebae0b7.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/2.png": "files/20180801_RS22373_images_c03d489555992707979c0d16d9747015bdda5232.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/6.png": "files/20180801_RS22373_images_da8b1004c13d077f48d8b764367da2ac25a0d7c2.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/5.png": "files/20180801_RS22373_images_e9873c76f3346f2676d3248c536b236e8b1074fa.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/3.png": "files/20180801_RS22373_images_43a63e6ff085c2d26298ea1dd926ce8c8daa0e1f.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/4.png": "files/20180801_RS22373_images_130f889aa34434e9a7e51107a80acb4eea44dc59.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RS22373", "sha1": "e01e3c7521d3e4393e52fdc3275fc2b3f0a41b5f", "filename": "files/20180801_RS22373_e01e3c7521d3e4393e52fdc3275fc2b3f0a41b5f.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4903, "name": "Strategy, Operations, & Emerging Threats" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 582747, "date": "2018-07-05", "retrieved": "2018-07-13T13:05:14.418599", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "In the years following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the Navy has carried out a variety of irregular warfare (IW) and counterterrorism (CT) activities. Among the most readily visible of these were operations carried out by Navy sailors serving ashore in the Middle East and Afghanistan, and the May 1-2, 2011, U.S. military operation in Abbottabad, Pakistan, that killed Osama bin Laden.\nDuring these years, the Navy took certain actions intended to improve its IW capabilities. For example, the Navy established the Navy Expeditionary Combat Command (NECC) informally in October 2005 and formally in January 2006. NECC consolidated and facilitated the expansion of a number of Navy organizations that have a role in IW operations. The Navy also established the Navy Irregular Warfare Office in July 2008, published a vision statement for irregular warfare in January 2010, and established \u201ca community of interest\u201d (COI) to develop and advance ideas, collaboration, and advocacy related to IW in December 2010.\nThe Navy during these years also reestablished its riverine force and initiated The Global Maritime Partnership, which was a U.S. Navy initiative to achieve an enhanced degree of cooperation between the U.S. Navy and foreign navies, coast guards, and maritime police forces, for the purpose of ensuring global maritime security against common threats. In addition, the Navy operated the Southern Partnership Station (SPS) and the Africa Partnership Station (APS), which were Navy ships, such as amphibious ships or high-speed sealift ships, that deployed to the Caribbean and to waters off Africa, respectively, to support U.S. Navy engagement with countries in those regions, particularly for purposes of building security partnerships with those countries and for increasing the capabilities of those countries for performing maritime-security operations.\nThe Navy\u2019s current IW and CT activities pose a number of potential oversight issues for Congress, including how much emphasis to place on IW and CT activities in Navy budgets, particularly in a context of constraints on Navy budgets and Navy desires to devote resources to developing \u201chigh end\u201d combat capabilities for countering improved conventional military capabilities of countries such as China and Russia.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RS22373", "sha1": "485a4eb2224acc1a3698f447e46c9f32c9b81c04", "filename": "files/20180705_RS22373_485a4eb2224acc1a3698f447e46c9f32c9b81c04.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/1.png": "files/20180705_RS22373_images_4b98b10ab12798df540b964846a4cd89ebdae2e9.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/2.png": "files/20180705_RS22373_images_c0928c7b8acbae03b8cbd3edc8032b1dba63be9e.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/0.png": "files/20180705_RS22373_images_ac78eb8890b4ab2fdc69d7d2f853b8b6bebae0b7.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/6.png": "files/20180705_RS22373_images_da8b1004c13d077f48d8b764367da2ac25a0d7c2.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/5.png": "files/20180705_RS22373_images_c2aa725294463d93c116f2908e601ae995d9868d.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/3.png": "files/20180705_RS22373_images_43a63e6ff085c2d26298ea1dd926ce8c8daa0e1f.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/4.png": "files/20180705_RS22373_images_130f889aa34434e9a7e51107a80acb4eea44dc59.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RS22373", "sha1": "16b3adf1c76ad966c7d4d59feb3ead1e8f8356e6", "filename": "files/20180705_RS22373_16b3adf1c76ad966c7d4d59feb3ead1e8f8356e6.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4903, "name": "Strategy, Operations, & Emerging Threats" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 581398, "date": "2018-05-21", "retrieved": "2018-05-23T22:06:54.792628", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "In the years following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the Navy has carried out a variety of irregular warfare (IW) and counterterrorism (CT) activities. Among the most readily visible of these were operations carried out by Navy sailors serving ashore in the Middle East and Afghanistan, and the May 1-2, 2011, U.S. military operation in Abbottabad, Pakistan, that killed Osama bin Laden.\nDuring these years, the Navy took certain actions intended to improve its IW capabilities. For example, the Navy established the Navy Expeditionary Combat Command (NECC) informally in October 2005 and formally in January 2006. NECC consolidated and facilitated the expansion of a number of Navy organizations that have a role in IW operations. The Navy also established the Navy Irregular Warfare Office in July 2008, published a vision statement for irregular warfare in January 2010, and established \u201ca community of interest\u201d (COI) to develop and advance ideas, collaboration, and advocacy related to IW in December 2010.\nThe Navy during these years also reestablished its riverine force and initiated The Global Maritime Partnership, which was a U.S. Navy initiative to achieve an enhanced degree of cooperation between the U.S. Navy and foreign navies, coast guards, and maritime police forces, for the purpose of ensuring global maritime security against common threats. In addition, the Navy operated the Southern Partnership Station (SPS) and the Africa Partnership Station (APS), which were Navy ships, such as amphibious ships or high-speed sealift ships, that deployed to the Caribbean and to waters off Africa, respectively, to support U.S. Navy engagement with countries in those regions, particularly for purposes of building security partnerships with those countries and for increasing the capabilities of those countries for performing maritime-security operations.\nThe Navy\u2019s current IW and CT activities pose a number of potential oversight issues for Congress, including how much emphasis to place on IW and CT activities in Navy budgets, particularly in a context of constraints on Navy budgets and Navy desires to devote resources to developing \u201chigh end\u201d combat capabilities for countering improved conventional military capabilities of countries such as China and Russia.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RS22373", "sha1": "bca66cefc01392ee18e8794e9721c75d2c528726", "filename": "files/20180521_RS22373_bca66cefc01392ee18e8794e9721c75d2c528726.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/1.png": "files/20180521_RS22373_images_4b98b10ab12798df540b964846a4cd89ebdae2e9.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/2.png": "files/20180521_RS22373_images_c03d489555992707979c0d16d9747015bdda5232.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/0.png": "files/20180521_RS22373_images_ac78eb8890b4ab2fdc69d7d2f853b8b6bebae0b7.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/6.png": "files/20180521_RS22373_images_da8b1004c13d077f48d8b764367da2ac25a0d7c2.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/5.png": "files/20180521_RS22373_images_e9873c76f3346f2676d3248c536b236e8b1074fa.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/3.png": "files/20180521_RS22373_images_43a63e6ff085c2d26298ea1dd926ce8c8daa0e1f.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/4.png": "files/20180521_RS22373_images_130f889aa34434e9a7e51107a80acb4eea44dc59.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RS22373", "sha1": "0bd75e6ec5eb1c8716626e7a7bf03664f6b7548c", "filename": "files/20180521_RS22373_0bd75e6ec5eb1c8716626e7a7bf03664f6b7548c.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4903, "name": "Strategy, Operations, & Emerging Threats" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 576596, "date": "2017-12-08", "retrieved": "2018-05-10T11:52:52.076792", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "In the years following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the Navy has carried out a variety of irregular warfare (IW) and counterterrorism (CT) activities. Among the most readily visible of these were operations carried out by Navy sailors serving ashore in the Middle East and Afghanistan, and the May 1-2, 2011, U.S. military operation in Abbottabad, Pakistan, that killed Osama bin Laden.\nDuring these years, the Navy took certain actions intended to improve its IW capabilities. For example, the Navy established the Navy Expeditionary Combat Command (NECC) informally in October 2005 and formally in January 2006. NECC consolidated and facilitated the expansion of a number of Navy organizations that have a role in IW operations. The Navy also established the Navy Irregular Warfare Office in July 2008, published a vision statement for irregular warfare in January 2010, and established \u201ca community of interest\u201d (COI) to develop and advance ideas, collaboration, and advocacy related to IW in December 2010.\nThe Navy during these years also reestablished its riverine force and initiated The Global Maritime Partnership, which was a U.S. Navy initiative to achieve an enhanced degree of cooperation between the U.S. Navy and foreign navies, coast guards, and maritime police forces, for the purpose of ensuring global maritime security against common threats. In addition, the Southern Partnership Station (SPS) and the Africa Partnership Station (APS) were Navy ships, such as amphibious ships or high-speed sealift ships, that deployed to the Caribbean and to waters off Africa, respectively, to support U.S. Navy engagement with countries in those regions, particularly for purposes of building security partnerships with those countries and for increasing the capabilities of those countries for performing maritime-security operations.\nThe Navy\u2019s current IW and CT activities pose a number of potential oversight issues for Congress, including how much emphasis to place on IW and CT activities in Navy budgets, particularly in a context of constraints on Navy budgets and Navy desires to devote resources to developing \u201chigh end\u201d combat capabilities for countering improved conventional military capabilities of countries such as China and Russia.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RS22373", "sha1": "91f77c963a05445f7e863709b6d41ed482abeeb0", "filename": "files/20171208_RS22373_91f77c963a05445f7e863709b6d41ed482abeeb0.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/1.png": "files/20171208_RS22373_images_e03832aa0d091ca27741706a1e89323a56b97761.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/2.png": "files/20171208_RS22373_images_9a33597420dca5cd6d592d571214c941e6ee81fb.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/0.png": "files/20171208_RS22373_images_bde79dbbfaca9808d501bc05f24b56ceda81ace2.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/6.png": "files/20171208_RS22373_images_a103faa66fac8b65ab35041b185e88093247cb3f.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/5.png": "files/20171208_RS22373_images_66d5eef60ffc7605d51d7161eeb8b6284d489ed2.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/3.png": "files/20171208_RS22373_images_0211478c2fa996b39878cd196f91ff710c0c3ca1.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/4.png": "files/20171208_RS22373_images_407e5a28890e1b355f8ba138400a46be2f131a6e.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RS22373", "sha1": "5d3ee1c5115f0e7aa769c8bb295f415ad046c206", "filename": "files/20171208_RS22373_5d3ee1c5115f0e7aa769c8bb295f415ad046c206.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4903, "name": "Strategy, Operations, & Emerging Threats" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 575988, "date": "2017-11-30", "retrieved": "2017-12-05T13:56:39.625731", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "In the years following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the Navy has carried out a variety of irregular warfare (IW) and counterterrorism (CT) activities. Among the most readily visible of these were operations carried out by Navy sailors serving ashore in the Middle East and Afghanistan, and the May 1-2, 2011, U.S. military operation in Abbottabad, Pakistan, that killed Osama bin Laden.\nDuring these years, the Navy took certain actions intended to improve its IW capabilities. For example, the Navy established the Navy Expeditionary Combat Command (NECC) informally in October 2005 and formally in January 2006. NECC consolidated and facilitated the expansion of a number of Navy organizations that have a role in IW operations. The Navy also established the Navy Irregular Warfare Office in July 2008, published a vision statement for irregular warfare in January 2010, and established \u201ca community of interest\u201d (COI) to develop and advance ideas, collaboration, and advocacy related to IW in December 2010.\nThe Navy during these years also reestablished its riverine force and initiated The Global Maritime Partnership, which was a U.S. Navy initiative to achieve an enhanced degree of cooperation between the U.S. Navy and foreign navies, coast guards, and maritime police forces, for the purpose of ensuring global maritime security against common threats. In addition, the Southern Partnership Station (SPS) and the Africa Partnership Station (APS) were Navy ships, such as amphibious ships or high-speed sealift ships, that deployed to the Caribbean and to waters off Africa, respectively, to support U.S. Navy engagement with countries in those regions, particularly for purposes of building security partnerships with those countries and for increasing the capabilities of those countries for performing maritime-security operations.\nThe Navy\u2019s current IW and CT activities pose a number of potential oversight issues for Congress, including how much emphasis to place on IW and CT activities in Navy budgets, particularly in a context of constraints on Navy budgets and Navy desires to devote resources to developing \u201chigh end\u201d combat capabilities for countering improved conventional military capabilities of countries such as China and Russia.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RS22373", "sha1": "c6107a5f3b2bfdfec94dcb14edb39c4bd698aeb1", "filename": "files/20171130_RS22373_c6107a5f3b2bfdfec94dcb14edb39c4bd698aeb1.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/1.png": "files/20171130_RS22373_images_e03832aa0d091ca27741706a1e89323a56b97761.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/0.png": "files/20171130_RS22373_images_bde79dbbfaca9808d501bc05f24b56ceda81ace2.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/2.png": "files/20171130_RS22373_images_9a33597420dca5cd6d592d571214c941e6ee81fb.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/6.png": "files/20171130_RS22373_images_a103faa66fac8b65ab35041b185e88093247cb3f.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/5.png": "files/20171130_RS22373_images_66d5eef60ffc7605d51d7161eeb8b6284d489ed2.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/3.png": "files/20171130_RS22373_images_0211478c2fa996b39878cd196f91ff710c0c3ca1.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/4.png": "files/20171130_RS22373_images_407e5a28890e1b355f8ba138400a46be2f131a6e.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RS22373", "sha1": "0e235a4429296b3082645b1d8eb0a5e07f2e0da1", "filename": "files/20171130_RS22373_0e235a4429296b3082645b1d8eb0a5e07f2e0da1.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4903, "name": "Strategy, Operations, & Emerging Threats" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 573664, "date": "2017-10-02", "retrieved": "2017-10-04T13:53:08.500054", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "In the years following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the Navy has carried out a variety of irregular warfare (IW) and counterterrorism (CT) activities. Among the most readily visible of these were operations carried out by Navy sailors serving ashore in the Middle East and Afghanistan, and the May 1-2, 2011, U.S. military operation in Abbottabad, Pakistan, that killed Osama bin Laden.\nDuring these years, the Navy took certain actions intended to improve its IW capabilities. For example, the Navy established the Navy Expeditionary Combat Command (NECC) informally in October 2005 and formally in January 2006. NECC consolidated and facilitated the expansion of a number of Navy organizations that have a role in IW operations. The Navy also established the Navy Irregular Warfare Office in July 2008, published a vision statement for irregular warfare in January 2010, and established \u201ca community of interest\u201d (COI) to develop and advance ideas, collaboration, and advocacy related to IW in December 2010.\nThe Navy during these years also reestablished its riverine force and initiated The Global Maritime Partnership, which was a U.S. Navy initiative to achieve an enhanced degree of cooperation between the U.S. Navy and foreign navies, coast guards, and maritime police forces, for the purpose of ensuring global maritime security against common threats. In addition, the Southern Partnership Station (SPS) and the Africa Partnership Station (APS) were Navy ships, such as amphibious ships or high-speed sealift ships, that deployed to the Caribbean and to waters off Africa, respectively, to support U.S. Navy engagement with countries in those regions, particularly for purposes of building security partnerships with those countries and for increasing the capabilities of those countries for performing maritime-security operations.\nThe Navy\u2019s current IW and CT activities pose a number of potential oversight issues for Congress, including how much emphasis to place on IW and CT activities in Navy budgets, particularly in a context of constraints on Navy budgets and Navy desires to devote resources to developing \u201chigh end\u201d combat capabilities for countering improved conventional military capabilities of countries such as China and Russia.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RS22373", "sha1": "2847728685e3779f3a40682dff17dc91d9854058", "filename": "files/20171002_RS22373_2847728685e3779f3a40682dff17dc91d9854058.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/1.png": "files/20171002_RS22373_images_e03832aa0d091ca27741706a1e89323a56b97761.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/0.png": "files/20171002_RS22373_images_bde79dbbfaca9808d501bc05f24b56ceda81ace2.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/2.png": "files/20171002_RS22373_images_9a33597420dca5cd6d592d571214c941e6ee81fb.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/6.png": "files/20171002_RS22373_images_a103faa66fac8b65ab35041b185e88093247cb3f.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/5.png": "files/20171002_RS22373_images_66d5eef60ffc7605d51d7161eeb8b6284d489ed2.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/3.png": "files/20171002_RS22373_images_0211478c2fa996b39878cd196f91ff710c0c3ca1.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/4.png": "files/20171002_RS22373_images_407e5a28890e1b355f8ba138400a46be2f131a6e.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RS22373", "sha1": "96c4483cfb5d7b8c4373a9dc3721ffddf22118f4", "filename": "files/20171002_RS22373_96c4483cfb5d7b8c4373a9dc3721ffddf22118f4.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4903, "name": "Strategy, Operations, & Emerging Threats" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 463295, "date": "2017-08-14", "retrieved": "2017-08-22T13:23:59.911621", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "In the years following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the Navy has carried out a variety of irregular warfare (IW) and counterterrorism (CT) activities. Among the most readily visible of these were operations carried out by Navy sailors serving ashore in the Middle East and Afghanistan, and the May 1-2, 2011, U.S. military operation in Abbottabad, Pakistan, that killed Osama bin Laden.\nDuring these years, the Navy took certain actions intended to improve its IW capabilities. For example, the Navy established the Navy Expeditionary Combat Command (NECC) informally in October 2005 and formally in January 2006. NECC consolidated and facilitated the expansion of a number of Navy organizations that have a role in IW operations. The Navy also established the Navy Irregular Warfare Office in July 2008, published a vision statement for irregular warfare in January 2010, and established \u201ca community of interest\u201d (COI) to develop and advance ideas, collaboration, and advocacy related to IW in December 2010.\nThe Navy during these years also reestablished its riverine force and initiated The Global Maritime Partnership, which was a U.S. Navy initiative to achieve an enhanced degree of cooperation between the U.S. Navy and foreign navies, coast guards, and maritime police forces, for the purpose of ensuring global maritime security against common threats. In addition, the Southern Partnership Station (SPS) and the Africa Partnership Station (APS) were Navy ships, such as amphibious ships or high-speed sealift ships, that deployed to the Caribbean and to waters off Africa, respectively, to support U.S. Navy engagement with countries in those regions, particularly for purposes of building security partnerships with those countries and for increasing the capabilities of those countries for performing maritime-security operations.\nThe Navy\u2019s current IW and CT activities pose a number of potential oversight issues for Congress, including how much emphasis to place on IW and CT activities in Navy budgets, particularly in a context of constraints on Navy budgets and Navy desires to devote resources to developing \u201chigh end\u201d combat capabilities for countering improved conventional military capabilities of countries such as China and Russia.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RS22373", "sha1": "bcc54f12cf0298ba773bb13b0528a65458860559", "filename": "files/20170814_RS22373_bcc54f12cf0298ba773bb13b0528a65458860559.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/1.png": "files/20170814_RS22373_images_e03832aa0d091ca27741706a1e89323a56b97761.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/2.png": "files/20170814_RS22373_images_86ce99817281be7278bb999c00c02082093994d2.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/0.png": "files/20170814_RS22373_images_0490cc1be376edfbe45cf40b5df391f406ca8986.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/6.png": "files/20170814_RS22373_images_4b6d69b01d68fe8b119693a92ec6b7c28f836f66.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/5.png": "files/20170814_RS22373_images_92be62c6b6c6d6d8349600bbccd4a2ffd3a0e4a8.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/3.png": "files/20170814_RS22373_images_a0b7814d27cfb767bfc0f01b434bcc65261afa6c.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RS/html/RS22373_files&id=/4.png": "files/20170814_RS22373_images_407e5a28890e1b355f8ba138400a46be2f131a6e.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RS22373", "sha1": "ae8bbfbec365bdf6e8e17185672bb53950bbb996", "filename": "files/20170814_RS22373_ae8bbfbec365bdf6e8e17185672bb53950bbb996.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4903, "name": "Strategy, Operations, & Emerging Threats" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 461695, "date": "2017-06-02", "retrieved": "2017-06-07T15:29:35.182527", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "In the years following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the Navy has carried out a variety of irregular warfare (IW) and counterterrorism (CT) activities. Among the most readily visible of these were operations carried out by Navy sailors serving ashore in the Middle East and Afghanistan, and the May 1-2, 2011, U.S. military operation in Abbottabad, Pakistan, that killed Osama bin Laden.\nDuring these years, the Navy took certain actions intended to improve its IW capabilities. For example, the Navy established the Navy Expeditionary Combat Command (NECC) informally in October 2005 and formally in January 2006. NECC consolidated and facilitated the expansion of a number of Navy organizations that have a role in IW operations. The Navy also established the Navy Irregular Warfare Office in July 2008, published a vision statement for irregular warfare in January 2010, and established \u201ca community of interest\u201d (COI) to develop and advance ideas, collaboration, and advocacy related to IW in December 2010.\nThe Navy during these years also reestablished its riverine force and initiated The Global Maritime Partnership, which was a U.S. Navy initiative to achieve an enhanced degree of cooperation between the U.S. Navy and foreign navies, coast guards, and maritime police forces, for the purpose of ensuring global maritime security against common threats. In addition, the Southern Partnership Station (SPS) and the Africa Partnership Station (APS) were Navy ships, such as amphibious ships or high-speed sealift ships, that deployed to the Caribbean and to waters off Africa, respectively, to support U.S. Navy engagement with countries in those regions, particularly for purposes of building security partnerships with those countries and for increasing the capabilities of those countries for performing maritime-security operations.\nThe Navy\u2019s current IW and CT activities pose a number of potential oversight issues for Congress, including how much emphasis to place on IW and CT activities in Navy budgets, particularly in a context of constraints on Navy budgets and Navy desires to devote resources to developing \u201chigh end\u201d combat capabilities for countering improved conventional military capabilities of countries such as China and Russia.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RS22373", "sha1": "c67de933af04c0de8a674dd65de76932940f516a", "filename": "files/20170602_RS22373_c67de933af04c0de8a674dd65de76932940f516a.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RS22373", "sha1": "2dc1a598678968bf737c314fbcd2978211c87f46", "filename": "files/20170602_RS22373_2dc1a598678968bf737c314fbcd2978211c87f46.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4903, "name": "Strategy, Operations, & Emerging Threats" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 461103, "date": "2017-05-12", "retrieved": "2017-05-16T14:29:37.428940", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "In the years following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the Navy carried out a variety of irregular warfare (IW) and counterterrorism (CT) activities. Among the most readily visible of these were operations carried out by Navy sailors serving ashore in the Middle East and Afghanistan, and the May 1-2, 2011, U.S. military operation in Abbottabad, Pakistan, that killed Osama bin Laden.\nDuring these years, the Navy took certain actions intended to improve its IW capabilities. For example, the Navy established the Navy Expeditionary Combat Command (NECC) informally in October 2005 and formally in January 2006. NECC consolidated and facilitated the expansion of a number of Navy organizations that have a role in IW operations. The Navy also established the Navy Irregular Warfare Office in July 2008, published a vision statement for irregular warfare in January 2010, and established \u201ca community of interest\u201d (COI) to develop and advance ideas, collaboration, and advocacy related to IW in December 2010.\nThe Navy during these years also reestablished its riverine force and initiated The Global Maritime Partnership, which was a U.S. Navy initiative to achieve an enhanced degree of cooperation between the U.S. Navy and foreign navies, coast guards, and maritime police forces, for the purpose of ensuring global maritime security against common threats. In addition, the Southern Partnership Station (SPS) and the Africa Partnership Station (APS) were Navy ships, such as amphibious ships or high-speed sealift ships, that deployed to the Caribbean and to waters off Africa, respectively, to support U.S. Navy engagement with countries in those regions, particularly for purposes of building security partnerships with those countries and for increasing the capabilities of those countries for performing maritime-security operations.\nThe Navy\u2019s current IW and CT activities pose a number of potential oversight issues for Congress, including how much emphasis to place on IW and CT activities in Navy budgets, particularly in a context of constraints on Navy budgets and Navy desires to devote resources to developing \u201chigh end\u201d combat capabilities for countering improved conventional military capabilities of countries such as China and Russia.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RS22373", "sha1": "0872f9de671ccc89d465e8307f09388b8b91a33a", "filename": "files/20170512_RS22373_0872f9de671ccc89d465e8307f09388b8b91a33a.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RS22373", "sha1": "8e58ecbf6bfcd61ed02c9c5e4ac83b110d35ba63", "filename": "files/20170512_RS22373_8e58ecbf6bfcd61ed02c9c5e4ac83b110d35ba63.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4903, "name": "Strategy, Operations, & Emerging Threats" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 459842, "date": "2017-03-21", "retrieved": "2017-03-22T18:24:09.978400", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "In the years following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the Navy carried out a variety of irregular warfare (IW) and counterterrorism (CT) activities. Among the most readily visible of these were operations carried out by Navy sailors serving ashore in the Middle East and Afghanistan, and the May 1-2, 2011, U.S. military operation in Abbottabad, Pakistan, that killed Osama bin Laden.\nDuring these years, the Navy took certain actions intended to improve its IW capabilities. For example, the Navy established the Navy Expeditionary Combat Command (NECC) informally in October 2005 and formally in January 2006. NECC consolidated and facilitated the expansion of a number of Navy organizations that have a role in IW operations. The Navy also established the Navy Irregular Warfare Office in July 2008, published a vision statement for irregular warfare in January 2010, and established \u201ca community of interest\u201d (COI) to develop and advance ideas, collaboration, and advocacy related to IW in December 2010.\nThe Navy during these years also reestablished its riverine force and initiated The Global Maritime Partnership, which was a U.S. Navy initiative to achieve an enhanced degree of cooperation between the U.S. Navy and foreign navies, coast guards, and maritime police forces, for the purpose of ensuring global maritime security against common threats. In addition, the Southern Partnership Station (SPS) and the Africa Partnership Station (APS) were Navy ships, such as amphibious ships or high-speed sealift ships, that deployed to the Caribbean and to waters off Africa, respectively, to support U.S. Navy engagement with countries in those regions, particularly for purposes of building security partnerships with those countries and for increasing the capabilities of those countries for performing maritime-security operations.\nThe Navy\u2019s current IW and CT activities pose a number of potential oversight issues for Congress, including how much emphasis to place on IW and CT activities in Navy budgets, particularly in a context of constraints on Navy budgets and Navy desires to devote resources to developing \u201chigh end\u201d combat capabilities for countering improved conventional military capabilities of countries such as China and Russia.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RS22373", "sha1": "676b38cf15365e217b87a510ff3d210189807ef9", "filename": "files/20170321_RS22373_676b38cf15365e217b87a510ff3d210189807ef9.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RS22373", "sha1": "7c82473b0771fe346c7c5b6c476d6a63b141d6c8", "filename": "files/20170321_RS22373_7c82473b0771fe346c7c5b6c476d6a63b141d6c8.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4903, "name": "Strategy, Operations, & Emerging Threats" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 455209, "date": "2016-08-19", "retrieved": "2016-10-17T19:34:47.354209", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "In the years following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the Navy carried out a variety of irregular warfare (IW) and counterterrorism (CT) activities. Among the most readily visible of these were operations carried out by Navy sailors serving ashore in the Middle East and Afghanistan, and the May 1-2, 2011, U.S. military operation in Abbottabad, Pakistan, that killed Osama bin Laden.\nDuring these years, the Navy took certain actions intended to improve its IW capabilities. For example, the Navy established the Navy Expeditionary Combat Command (NECC) informally in October 2005 and formally in January 2006. NECC consolidated and facilitated the expansion of a number of Navy organizations that have a role in IW operations. The Navy also established the Navy Irregular Warfare Office in July 2008, published a vision statement for irregular warfare in January 2010, and established \u201ca community of interest\u201d (COI) to develop and advance ideas, collaboration, and advocacy related to IW in December 2010.\nThe Navy during these years also reestablished its riverine force and initiated The Global Maritime Partnership, which was a U.S. Navy initiative to achieve an enhanced degree of cooperation between the U.S. Navy and foreign navies, coast guards, and maritime police forces, for the purpose of ensuring global maritime security against common threats. In addition, the Southern Partnership Station (SPS) and the Africa Partnership Station (APS) were Navy ships, such as amphibious ships or high-speed sealift ships, that deployed to the Caribbean and to waters off Africa, respectively, to support U.S. Navy engagement with countries in those regions, particularly for purposes of building security partnerships with those countries and for increasing the capabilities of those countries for performing maritime-security operations.\nThe Navy\u2019s current IW and CT activities pose a number of potential oversight issues for Congress, including how much emphasis to place on IW and CT activities in Navy budgets, particularly in a context of constraints on Navy budgets and Navy desires to devote resources to developing \u201chigh end\u201d combat capabilities for countering improved conventional military capabilities of countries such as China and Russia.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RS22373", "sha1": "900c8a9f11caf77c02c961b847adfe3a2eca5368", "filename": "files/20160819_RS22373_900c8a9f11caf77c02c961b847adfe3a2eca5368.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RS22373", "sha1": "0b575da7513a7ba71ae940e11c9d72cbeb665077", "filename": "files/20160819_RS22373_0b575da7513a7ba71ae940e11c9d72cbeb665077.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4903, "name": "Strategy, Operations, & Emerging Threats" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 452999, "date": "2016-05-27", "retrieved": "2016-06-21T21:13:07.442819", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "The Navy in recent years has carried out a variety of irregular warfare (IW) and counterterrorism (CT) activities. Among the most readily visible of the Navy\u2019s recent IW operations in recent years have been those carried out by Navy sailors serving ashore in the Middle East and Afghanistan. \nThe May 1-2, 2011, U.S. military operation in Abbottabad, Pakistan, that killed Osama bin Laden reportedly was carried out by a team of 23 Navy special operations forces, known as SEALs (an acronym standing for Sea, Air, and Land). The SEALs reportedly belonged to an elite unit known unofficially as Seal Team 6 and officially as the Naval Special Warfare Development Group (DEVGRU).\nThe Navy established the Navy Expeditionary Combat Command (NECC) informally in October 2005 and formally in January 2006. NECC consolidated and facilitated the expansion of a number of Navy organizations that have a role in IW operations. The Navy established the Navy Irregular Warfare Office in July 2008, published a vision statement for irregular warfare in January 2010, and established \u201ca community of interest\u201d to develop and advance ideas, collaboration, and advocacy related to IW in December 2010.\nThe Navy\u2019s riverine force is intended to supplement the riverine capabilities of the Navy\u2019s SEALs and relieve Marines who had been conducting maritime security operations in ports and waterways in Iraq.\nThe Global Maritime Partnership is a U.S. Navy initiative to achieve an enhanced degree of cooperation between the U.S. Navy and foreign navies, coast guards, and maritime police forces, for the purpose of ensuring global maritime security against common threats.\nThe Southern Partnership Station (SPS) and the Africa Partnership Station (APS) are Navy ships, such as amphibious ships or high-speed sealift ships, that have deployed to the Caribbean and to waters off Africa, respectively, to support U.S. Navy engagement with countries in those regions, particularly for purposes of building security partnerships with those countries and for increasing the capabilities of those countries for performing maritime-security operations.\nThe Navy\u2019s IW and CT activities pose a number of potential oversight issues for Congress, including how much emphasis to place on IW and CT activities in future Navy budgets.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RS22373", "sha1": "6e576a36c0e035011765da5fb3ea96e1e6de5131", "filename": "files/20160527_RS22373_6e576a36c0e035011765da5fb3ea96e1e6de5131.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RS22373", "sha1": "c7425a5aceea75c4e8d66241dc72e66a354b66d2", "filename": "files/20160527_RS22373_c7425a5aceea75c4e8d66241dc72e66a354b66d2.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 3153, "name": "Defense Strategy, Military Operations, and Force Structure" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 451142, "date": "2016-03-25", "retrieved": "2016-04-06T16:53:54.686033", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "The Navy in recent years has carried out a variety of irregular warfare (IW) and counterterrorism (CT) activities. Among the most readily visible of the Navy\u2019s recent IW operations in recent years have been those carried out by Navy sailors serving ashore in the Middle East and Afghanistan. \nThe May 1-2, 2011, U.S. military operation in Abbottabad, Pakistan, that killed Osama bin Laden reportedly was carried out by a team of 23 Navy special operations forces, known as SEALs (an acronym standing for Sea, Air, and Land). The SEALs reportedly belonged to an elite unit known unofficially as Seal Team 6 and officially as the Naval Special Warfare Development Group (DEVGRU).\nThe Navy established the Navy Expeditionary Combat Command (NECC) informally in October 2005 and formally in January 2006. NECC consolidated and facilitated the expansion of a number of Navy organizations that have a role in IW operations. The Navy established the Navy Irregular Warfare Office in July 2008, published a vision statement for irregular warfare in January 2010, and established \u201ca community of interest\u201d to develop and advance ideas, collaboration, and advocacy related to IW in December 2010.\nThe Navy\u2019s riverine force is intended to supplement the riverine capabilities of the Navy\u2019s SEALs and relieve Marines who had been conducting maritime security operations in ports and waterways in Iraq.\nThe Global Maritime Partnership is a U.S. Navy initiative to achieve an enhanced degree of cooperation between the U.S. Navy and foreign navies, coast guards, and maritime police forces, for the purpose of ensuring global maritime security against common threats.\nThe Southern Partnership Station (SPS) and the Africa Partnership Station (APS) are Navy ships, such as amphibious ships or high-speed sealift ships, that have deployed to the Caribbean and to waters off Africa, respectively, to support U.S. Navy engagement with countries in those regions, particularly for purposes of building security partnerships with those countries and for increasing the capabilities of those countries for performing maritime-security operations.\nThe Navy\u2019s IW and CT activities pose a number of potential oversight issues for Congress, including how much emphasis to place on IW and CT activities in future Navy budgets.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RS22373", "sha1": "032640b47237f87f074e3d92b1903e24aa0c3b10", "filename": "files/20160325_RS22373_032640b47237f87f074e3d92b1903e24aa0c3b10.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RS22373", "sha1": "1e90698359722e22eba1b1fefdb087bb8faf37b7", "filename": "files/20160325_RS22373_1e90698359722e22eba1b1fefdb087bb8faf37b7.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 3153, "name": "Defense Strategy, Military Operations, and Force Structure" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc795467/", "id": "RS22373_2015Nov06", "date": "2015-11-06", "retrieved": "2016-01-13T14:26:20", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report provides background information and potential issues for Congress on the Navy's irregular warfare (IW) and counterterrorism (CT) operations.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20151106_RS22373_31adcf3c872bcd0d77e72a7f5a246d59f2cb03f2.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20151106_RS22373_31adcf3c872bcd0d77e72a7f5a246d59f2cb03f2.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Navy -- U.S.", "name": "Navy -- U.S." }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Counterterrorism", "name": "Counterterrorism" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense policy", "name": "Defense policy" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc795549/", "id": "RS22373_2015Sep25", "date": "2015-09-25", "retrieved": "2016-01-13T14:26:20", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report provides background information and potential issues for Congress on the Navy's irregular warfare (IW) and counterterrorism (CT) operations. Congress's decisions regarding Navy IW and CT operations can affect Navy operations and funding requirements, and the implementation of the nation's overall IW and CT strategies.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20150925_RS22373_2bc11aae40d105fbb6e167cbbdfb2b3ed5d3ccf1.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20150925_RS22373_2bc11aae40d105fbb6e167cbbdfb2b3ed5d3ccf1.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Counterterrorism", "name": "Counterterrorism" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense policy", "name": "Defense policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Navy -- U.S.", "name": "Navy -- U.S." } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc743401/", "id": "RS22373_2015Aug28", "date": "2015-08-28", "retrieved": "2015-10-20T21:35:54", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report provides background information and potential issues for Congress on the Navy's irregular warfare (IW) and counterterrorism (CT) operations. The Navy's IW and CT activities pose a number of potential oversight issues for Congress, including how much emphasis to place on IW and CT activities in future Navy budgets. Congress's decisions regarding Navy IW and CT operations can affect Navy operations and funding requirements, and the implementation of the nation's overall IW and CT strategies.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20150828_RS22373_44b41532da9710a83193a87c092407369c6035e4.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20150828_RS22373_44b41532da9710a83193a87c092407369c6035e4.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Counterterrorism", "name": "Counterterrorism" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense policy", "name": "Defense policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Navy -- U.S.", "name": "Navy -- U.S." } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc503600/", "id": "RS22373_2015Mar04", "date": "2015-03-04", "retrieved": "2015-04-30T17:37:21", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report provides background information and potential issues for Congress on the Navy's irregular warfare (IW) and counterterrorism (CT) operations. The Navy's IW and CT activities pose a number of potential oversight issues for Congress, including the definition of Navy IW activities and how much emphasis to place on IW and CT activities in future Navy budgets.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20150304_RS22373_b94972be07211f03231a64b35ad8168a8cd112de.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20150304_RS22373_b94972be07211f03231a64b35ad8168a8cd112de.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Counterterrorism", "name": "Counterterrorism" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense policy", "name": "Defense policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Navy -- U.S.", "name": "Navy -- U.S." } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc332952/", "id": "RS22373_2014Jun25", "date": "2014-06-25", "retrieved": "2014-08-27T12:47:05", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report provides background information and potential issues for Congress on the Navy's irregular warfare (IW) and counterterrorism (CT) operations. The Navy's IW and CT activities pose a number of potential oversight issues for Congress, including the definition of Navy IW activities and how much emphasis to place on IW and CT activities in future Navy budgets.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20140625_RS22373_c91b9d5abba2f324a6658f0ab10c842c894cfed1.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20140625_RS22373_c91b9d5abba2f324a6658f0ab10c842c894cfed1.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense policy", "name": "Defense policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Navy -- U.S.", "name": "Navy -- U.S." }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Counterterrorism", "name": "Counterterrorism" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc306483/", "id": "RS22373_2014Jun05", "date": "2014-06-05", "retrieved": "2014-07-08T21:53:44", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report provides background information and potential issues for Congress on the Navy's irregular warfare (IW) and counterterrorism (CT) operations. The Navy's IW and CT activities pose a number of potential oversight issues for Congress, including the definition of Navy IW activities and how much emphasis to place on IW and CT activities in future Navy budgets.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20140605_RS22373_02a2d6e34cd3ce36dde4b9bed997c5f2d8a26d72.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20140605_RS22373_02a2d6e34cd3ce36dde4b9bed997c5f2d8a26d72.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense policy", "name": "Defense policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Navy -- U.S.", "name": "Navy -- U.S." }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Counterterrorism", "name": "Counterterrorism" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc282337/", "id": "RS22373_2014Feb07", "date": "2014-02-07", "retrieved": "2014-04-02T19:38:14", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report provides background information and potential issues for Congress on the Navy's irregular warfare (IW) and counterterrorism (CT) operations. The Navy's IW and CT activities pose a number of potential oversight issues for Congress, including the definition of Navy IW activities and how much emphasis to place on IW and CT activities in future Navy budgets.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20140207_RS22373_803e117dbaae91d1547bf4073746a20541ac5c7b.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20140207_RS22373_803e117dbaae91d1547bf4073746a20541ac5c7b.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense policy", "name": "Defense policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Navy -- U.S.", "name": "Navy -- U.S." }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Counterterrorism", "name": "Counterterrorism" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc228143/", "id": "RS22373_2013Aug06", "date": "2013-08-06", "retrieved": "2013-11-05T18:07:05", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report provides background information and potential issues for Congress on the Navy's irregular warfare (IW) and counterterrorism (CT) operations. The Navy's IW and CT activities pose a number of potential oversight issues for Congress, including the definition of Navy IW activities and how much emphasis to place on IW and CT activities in future Navy budgets.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20130806_RS22373_e68de1a451a2fe15191eca88a05a1ce45eb4096b.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20130806_RS22373_e68de1a451a2fe15191eca88a05a1ce45eb4096b.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense policy", "name": "Defense policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Navy -- U.S.", "name": "Navy -- U.S." }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Counterterrorism", "name": "Counterterrorism" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc462249/", "id": "RS22373_2013Apr25", "date": "2013-04-25", "retrieved": "2014-12-05T09:57:41", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report provides background information and potential issues for Congress on the Navy's irregular warfare (IW) and counterterrorism (CT) operations. The Navy's IW and CT activities pose a number of potential oversight issues for Congress, including the definition of Navy IW activities and how much emphasis to place on IW and CT activities in future Navy budgets.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20130425_RS22373_a3ca87733f325808c6a4b41765109aa1d6397071.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20130425_RS22373_a3ca87733f325808c6a4b41765109aa1d6397071.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense policy", "name": "Defense policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Navy -- U.S.", "name": "Navy -- U.S." }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Counterterrorism", "name": "Counterterrorism" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc462497/", "id": "RS22373_2013Mar27", "date": "2013-03-27", "retrieved": "2014-12-05T09:57:41", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report provides background information and potential issues for Congress on the Navy's irregular warfare (IW) and counterterrorism (CT) operations. The Navy's IW and CT activities pose a number of potential oversight issues for Congress, including the definition of Navy IW activities and how much emphasis to place on IW and CT activities in future Navy budgets.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20130327_RS22373_de96b0c0690a1fdc306fe91ae582c1beac6b935a.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20130327_RS22373_de96b0c0690a1fdc306fe91ae582c1beac6b935a.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense policy", "name": "Defense policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Navy -- U.S.", "name": "Navy -- U.S." }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Counterterrorism", "name": "Counterterrorism" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc462471/", "id": "RS22373_2013Mar15", "date": "2013-03-15", "retrieved": "2014-12-05T09:57:41", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report provides background information and potential issues for Congress on the Navy's irregular warfare (IW) and counterterrorism (CT) operations. The Navy's IW and CT activities pose a number of potential oversight issues for Congress, including the definition of Navy IW activities and how much emphasis to place on IW and CT activities in future Navy budgets.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20130315_RS22373_199c6918808673342fd60a5e5e99c5c98abae36d.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20130315_RS22373_199c6918808673342fd60a5e5e99c5c98abae36d.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense policy", "name": "Defense policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Navy -- U.S.", "name": "Navy -- U.S." }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Counterterrorism", "name": "Counterterrorism" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc463035/", "id": "RS22373_2012Dec20", "date": "2012-12-20", "retrieved": "2014-12-05T09:57:41", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report provides background information and potential issues for Congress on the Navy's irregular warfare (IW) and counterterrorism (CT) operations. The Navy's IW and CT activities pose a number of potential oversight issues for Congress, including the definition of Navy IW activities and how much emphasis to place on IW and CT activities in future Navy budgets.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20121220_RS22373_3fdbb24cb9ad1ae25d1373272bd7d5595882fa0d.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20121220_RS22373_3fdbb24cb9ad1ae25d1373272bd7d5595882fa0d.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense policy", "name": "Defense policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Navy -- U.S.", "name": "Navy -- U.S." }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Counterterrorism", "name": "Counterterrorism" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc817414/", "id": "RS22373_2012Oct18", "date": "2012-10-18", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20121018_RS22373_2ee6a5728408d20beea798f728d802d01fb437fa.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20121018_RS22373_2ee6a5728408d20beea798f728d802d01fb437fa.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc807760/", "id": "RS22373_2012Aug10", "date": "2012-08-10", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20120810_RS22373_a6e61e575de5a61da1fbc21c6e77c67cda78203a.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20120810_RS22373_a6e61e575de5a61da1fbc21c6e77c67cda78203a.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc94219/", "id": "RS22373_2012Jun27", "date": "2012-06-27", "retrieved": "2012-07-24T12:39:36", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report provides background information and potential issues for Congress on the Navy's irregular warfare (IW) and counterterrorism (CT) operations. News reports about the May 1, 2011, U.S. military operation in Pakistan that killed Osama Bin Laden state that the operation was carried out by a team of 20 to 25 Navy special operations forces, known as SEALs, specifically an elite unit known as Seal Team 6.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20120627_RS22373_29cf2ab63e07c4a13fe781e4a0dd40223b5683fe.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20120627_RS22373_29cf2ab63e07c4a13fe781e4a0dd40223b5683fe.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense policy", "name": "Defense policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Navy -- U.S.", "name": "Navy -- U.S." }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Counterterrorism", "name": "Counterterrorism" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Unconventional warfare", "name": "Unconventional warfare" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc94220/", "id": "RS22373_2012Mar07", "date": "2012-06-13", "retrieved": "2012-07-24T12:39:36", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report provides background information and potential issues for Congress on the Navy's irregular warfare (IW) and counterterrorism (CT) operations. News reports about the May 1, 2011, U.S. military operation in Pakistan that killed Osama Bin Laden state that the operation was carried out by a team of 20 to 25 Navy special operations forces, known as SEALs, specifically an elite unit known as Seal Team 6.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20120613_RS22373_691d70ccf15df18618cd99c242b82f4375a2ddfd.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20120613_RS22373_691d70ccf15df18618cd99c242b82f4375a2ddfd.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense policy", "name": "Defense policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Navy -- U.S.", "name": "Navy -- U.S." }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Counterterrorism", "name": "Counterterrorism" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Unconventional warfare", "name": "Unconventional warfare" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc84125/", "id": "RS22373_2012Apr06", "date": "2012-04-06", "retrieved": "2012-04-27T15:49:45", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "The Navy for several years has carried out a variety of irregular warfare (IW) and counterterrorism (CT) activities. Among the most readily visible of the Navy's recent IW operations have been those carried out by Navy sailors serving ashore in Afghanistan and Iraq. The May 1-2, 2011, U.S. military operation in Abbottabad, Pakistan, that killed Osama bin Laden reportedly was carried out by a team of 23 Navy special operations forces. The Navy's IW and CT activities pose a number of potential oversight issues for Congress, including the definition of Navy IW activities and Navy budgeting.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20120406_RS22373_e43856f8629016d2aac85e5d04cdfe03a1cd8044.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20120406_RS22373_e43856f8629016d2aac85e5d04cdfe03a1cd8044.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense policy", "name": "Defense policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Navy - U.S.", "name": "Navy - U.S." }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Counterterrorism", "name": "Counterterrorism" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Unconventional warfare", "name": "Unconventional warfare" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc85490/", "id": "RS22373_2012Mar07", "date": "2012-03-07", "retrieved": "2012-06-06T14:34:05", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report discusses the U.S. Navy's efforts in recent years to strengthen its ability to carry out irregular warfare (IW) counterterrorism (CT) activities. Some of the activities and organizations explored in this report are the creation of the Navy Expeditionary Combat Command (NECC), the Navy's riverine force, the Navy Irregular Warfare Office, and the Global Maritime Partnership. The report also discusses what potential oversight issues the Navy's IW and CT activities pose for Congress, including budget priorities.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20120307_RS22373_691d70ccf15df18618cd99c242b82f4375a2ddfd.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20120307_RS22373_691d70ccf15df18618cd99c242b82f4375a2ddfd.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense policy", "name": "Defense policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Navy - U.S.", "name": "Navy - U.S." }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Counterterrorism", "name": "Counterterrorism" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Unconventional warfare", "name": "Unconventional warfare" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc84123/", "id": "RS22373_2011Nov08", "date": "2011-11-08", "retrieved": "2012-04-27T15:49:45", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report provides background information and potential issues for Congress on the Navy's irregular warfare (IW) and counterterrorism (CT) operations. The Navy's IW and CT activities pose a number of potential oversight issues for Congress, including the definition of Navy IW activities, specific Navy IW budget priorities, and how much emphasis to place on IW and CT activities in future Navy budgets. Congress' decisions regarding Navy IW and CT operations can affect Navy operations and funding requirements, and the implementation of the nation's overall IW and CT strategies.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20111108_RS22373_439d2f090d32187113ebe3057da0ee47fce1e14f.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20111108_RS22373_439d2f090d32187113ebe3057da0ee47fce1e14f.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense policy", "name": "Defense policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Counterterrorism", "name": "Counterterrorism" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Navy - U.S.", "name": "Navy - U.S." }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Unconventional warfare", "name": "Unconventional warfare" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc84124/", "id": "RS22373_2011Sep16", "date": "2011-09-16", "retrieved": "2012-04-27T15:49:45", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report provides background information and potential issues for Congress on the Navy's irregular warfare (IW) and counterterrorism (CT) operations. News reports about the May 1, 2011, U.S. military operation in Pakistan that killed Osama Bin Laden state that the operation was carried out by a team of 20 to 25 Navy special operations forces, known as SEALs, specifically an elite unit known as Seal Team 6.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20110916_RS22373_b4c590a38746ae86e038127d9bff93bff50e8e29.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20110916_RS22373_b4c590a38746ae86e038127d9bff93bff50e8e29.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense policy", "name": "Defense policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Counterterrorism", "name": "Counterterrorism" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Navy - U.S.", "name": "Navy - U.S." }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Unconventional warfare", "name": "Unconventional warfare" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc812905/", "id": "RS22373_2011Aug10", "date": "2011-08-10", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20110810_RS22373_ebd474d882a3e7f032769a675bd7303b46e7f59f.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20110810_RS22373_ebd474d882a3e7f032769a675bd7303b46e7f59f.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc40269/", "id": "RS22373_2011May2", "date": "2011-05-02", "retrieved": "2011-08-27T10:13:38", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report provides background information and potential issues for Congress on the Navy's irregular warfare (IW) and counterterrorism (CT) operations. News reports about the May 1, 2011, U.S. military operation in Pakistan that killed Osama Bin Laden state that the operation was carried out by a team of 20 to 25 Navy special operations forces, known as SEALs, specifically an elite unit known as Seal Team 6.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20110502_RS22373_5947e2a3b8020e37c7f14e8d774df14a1b72cbbf.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20110502_RS22373_5947e2a3b8020e37c7f14e8d774df14a1b72cbbf.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense policy", "name": "Defense policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Counterterrorism", "name": "Counterterrorism" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Navy - U.S.", "name": "Navy - U.S." }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Unconventional warfare", "name": "Unconventional warfare" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc40268/", "id": "RS22373_2011April11", "date": "2011-04-11", "retrieved": "2011-08-27T10:13:38", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report provides background information and potential issues for Congress on the Navy's irregular warfare (IW) and counterterrorism (CT) operations. The Navy's IW and CT activities pose a number of potential oversight issues for Congress, including the definition of Navy IW activities, specific Navy IW budget priorities, and how much emphasis to place on IW and CT activities in future Navy budgets. Congress' decisions regarding Navy IW and CT operations can affect Navy operations and funding requirements, and the implementation of the nation's overall IW and CT strategies.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20110411_RS22373_db29243acca29da06c8fd5d393b1134a4f311024.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20110411_RS22373_db29243acca29da06c8fd5d393b1134a4f311024.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense policy", "name": "Defense policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Counterterrorism", "name": "Counterterrorism" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Navy - U.S.", "name": "Navy - U.S." }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Unconventional warfare", "name": "Unconventional warfare" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc228142/", "id": "RS22373_2011Jan21", "date": "2011-01-21", "retrieved": "2013-11-05T18:07:05", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "Report that details the Navy's irregular warfare (IW) and counterterrorism (CT) activities.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20110121_RS22373_f9f030dd67eb93d857fc603fd969afaac3075cd0.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20110121_RS22373_f9f030dd67eb93d857fc603fd969afaac3075cd0.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense policy", "name": "Defense policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Navy -- U.S.", "name": "Navy -- U.S." }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Counterterrorism", "name": "Counterterrorism" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Unconventional warfare", "name": "Unconventional warfare" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc821766/", "id": "RS22373_2011Jan14", "date": "2011-01-14", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20110114_RS22373_f768118f81561fa07ceece6347157c1887f6f7ed.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20110114_RS22373_f768118f81561fa07ceece6347157c1887f6f7ed.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc29742/", "id": "RS22373_2010Oct22", "date": "2010-10-22", "retrieved": "2010-12-04T14:26:25", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report discusses the U.S. Navy's efforts in recent years to strengthen its ability to carry out irregular warfare (IW) counterterrorism (CT) activities. Some of the activities and organizations explored in this report are the creation of the Navy Expeditionary Combat Command (NECC), the Navy's riverine force, the Navy Irregular Warfare Office, and the Global Maritime Partnership. The report also discusses what potential oversight issues the Navy's IW and CT activities pose for Congress, including budget priorities.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20101022_RS22373_4c4b476fbb1d915eb7d12b86ff2226e0929fa77d.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20101022_RS22373_4c4b476fbb1d915eb7d12b86ff2226e0929fa77d.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense policy", "name": "Defense policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Navy - U.S.", "name": "Navy - U.S." }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Counterterrorism", "name": "Counterterrorism" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Unconventional warfare", "name": "Unconventional warfare" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc29743/", "id": "RS22373_2010Sep28", "date": "2010-09-28", "retrieved": "2010-12-04T14:26:25", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "The Navy for several years has carried out a variety of irregular warfare (IW) and counterterrorism (CT) activities, and has taken some steps in recent years to strengthen its ability to conduct such activities. Among the most readily visible of the Navy's current IW operations are those being carried out by Navy sailors serving ashore in Iraq and Afghanistan. The Navy's IW and CT activities pose a number of potential oversight issues for Congress, including the definition of Navy IW activities, specific Navy IW budget priorities, and how much emphasis to place on IW and CT activities in future Navy budgets.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20100928_RS22373_778c59f221d74fd1a13f36f4b6db9e328e26d263.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20100928_RS22373_778c59f221d74fd1a13f36f4b6db9e328e26d263.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense policy", "name": "Defense policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Counterterrorism", "name": "Counterterrorism" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Navy - U.S.", "name": "Navy - U.S." }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Unconventional warfare", "name": "Unconventional warfare" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc490980/", "id": "RS22373_2010Aug17", "date": "2010-08-17", "retrieved": "2015-01-27T19:40:46", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report discusses the U.S. Navy's efforts in recent years to strengthen its ability to carry out irregular warfare (IW) counterterrorism (CT) activities. Some of the activities and organizations explored in this report are the creation of the Navy Expeditionary Combat Command (NECC), the Navy's riverine force, the Navy Irregular Warfare Office, and the Global Maritime Partnership. The report also discusses what potential oversight issues the Navy's IW and CT activities pose for Congress, including budget priorities.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20100817_RS22373_98d793cf84ef7d526147455a7bccc57b1bb3902b.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20100817_RS22373_98d793cf84ef7d526147455a7bccc57b1bb3902b.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Counterterrorism", "name": "Counterterrorism" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense policy", "name": "Defense policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Navy -- U.S.", "name": "Navy -- U.S." }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Unconventional warfare", "name": "Unconventional warfare" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc491663/", "id": "RS22373_2010Jul30", "date": "2010-07-30", "retrieved": "2015-01-27T19:40:46", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report provides background information and potential issues for Congress on the Navy's irregular warfare (IW) and counterterrorism (CT) operations. The Navy's IW and CT activities pose a number of potential oversight issues for Congress, including the definition of Navy IW activities and how much emphasis to place on IW and CT activities in future Navy budgets.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20100730_RS22373_c5c702665a44a8472002282d8584f57c906ff60f.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20100730_RS22373_c5c702665a44a8472002282d8584f57c906ff60f.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Counterterrorism", "name": "Counterterrorism" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense policy", "name": "Defense policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Navy -- U.S.", "name": "Navy -- U.S." } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc490867/", "id": "RS22373_2010Jun10", "date": "2010-06-10", "retrieved": "2015-01-27T19:40:46", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report discusses the U.S. Navy's efforts in recent years to strengthen its ability to carry out irregular warfare (IW) counterterrorism (CT) activities. Some of the activities and organizations explored in this report are the creation of the Navy Expeditionary Combat Command (NECC), the Navy's riverine force, the Navy Irregular Warfare Office, and the Global Maritime Partnership. The report also discusses what potential oversight issues the Navy's IW and CT activities pose for Congress, including budget priorities.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20100610_RS22373_d75a43f58389f193339c98b4e0b6a11bb0c407b0.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20100610_RS22373_d75a43f58389f193339c98b4e0b6a11bb0c407b0.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense policy", "name": "Defense policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Navy -- U.S.", "name": "Navy -- U.S." }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Counterterrorism", "name": "Counterterrorism" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Unconventional warfare", "name": "Unconventional warfare" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc501798/", "id": "RS22373_2010May28", "date": "2010-05-28", "retrieved": "2015-03-30T22:03:27", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "The Department of Defense (DOD) is placing an increased planning and budgeting emphasis on irregular warfare (IW) operations, such as counterinsurgency operations. In addition, counterterrorism (CT) operations have been a DOD area of emphasis since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. The Navy for several years has carried out a variety of IW and CT activities, and has taken some steps in recent years to strengthen its ability to conduct such activities. This report discusses these activities and potential oversight issues raised by them.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20100528_RS22373_6070cefecb29493cd35a62deb8067f5e65f791ae.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20100528_RS22373_6070cefecb29493cd35a62deb8067f5e65f791ae.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense policy", "name": "Defense policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Navy -- U.S.", "name": "Navy -- U.S." }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Counterterrorism", "name": "Counterterrorism" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Unconventional warfare", "name": "Unconventional warfare" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc503342/", "id": "RS22373_2010Mar31", "date": "2010-03-31", "retrieved": "2015-04-30T17:37:21", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report provides background information and potential issues for Congress on the Navy's irregular warfare (IW) and counterterrorism (CT) operations. The Navy's IW and CT activities pose a number of potential oversight issues for Congress, including the definition of Navy IW activities and how much emphasis to place on IW and CT activities in future Navy budgets.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20100331_RS22373_c06cf101d36f17973814a439de683048cf58811f.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20100331_RS22373_c06cf101d36f17973814a439de683048cf58811f.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Counterterrorism", "name": "Counterterrorism" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense policy", "name": "Defense policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Navy -- U.S.", "name": "Navy -- U.S." } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc501969/", "id": "RS22373_2009Dec23", "date": "2009-12-23", "retrieved": "2015-03-30T22:03:27", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "The Department of Defense (DOD) is placing an increased planning and budgeting emphasis on irregular warfare (IW) operations, such as counterinsurgency operations. In addition, counterterrorism (CT) operations have been a DOD area of emphasis since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. The Navy for several years has carried out a variety of IW and CT activities, and has taken some steps in recent years to strengthen its ability to conduct such activities. This report discusses these activities and potential oversight issues raised by them.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20091223_RS22373_f23d952cad7874989731f09fca6de5e93c3059b2.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20091223_RS22373_f23d952cad7874989731f09fca6de5e93c3059b2.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense policy", "name": "Defense policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Navy -- U.S.", "name": "Navy -- U.S." }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Counterterrorism", "name": "Counterterrorism" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Unconventional warfare", "name": "Unconventional warfare" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc501538/", "id": "RS22373_2009Oct22", "date": "2009-10-22", "retrieved": "2015-03-30T22:03:27", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "The Department of Defense (DOD) is placing an increased planning and budgeting emphasis on irregular warfare (IW) operations, such as counterinsurgency operations. In addition, counterterrorism (CT) operations have been a DOD area of emphasis since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. The Navy for several years has carried out a variety of IW and CT activities, and has taken some steps in recent years to strengthen its ability to conduct such activities. This report discusses these activities and potential oversight issues raised by them.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20091022_RS22373_35b725ed8e334d62cb66f0e72d9ba43e13236f98.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20091022_RS22373_35b725ed8e334d62cb66f0e72d9ba43e13236f98.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense policy", "name": "Defense policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Navy -- U.S.", "name": "Navy -- U.S." }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Counterterrorism", "name": "Counterterrorism" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Unconventional warfare", "name": "Unconventional warfare" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc501557/", "id": "RS22373_2009Oct08", "date": "2009-10-08", "retrieved": "2015-03-30T22:03:27", "title": "Navy Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism Operations: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "The Department of Defense (DOD) is placing an increased planning and budgeting emphasis on irregular warfare (IW) operations, such as counterinsurgency operations. In addition, counterterrorism (CT) operations have been a DOD area of emphasis since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. The Navy for several years has carried out a variety of IW and CT activities, and has taken some steps in recent years to strengthen its ability to conduct such activities. This report discusses these activities and potential oversight issues raised by them.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20091008_RS22373_0d5e7a200611256777474fcf941348d7d71e8dac.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20091008_RS22373_0d5e7a200611256777474fcf941348d7d71e8dac.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense policy", "name": "Defense policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Navy -- U.S.", "name": "Navy -- U.S." }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Counterterrorism", "name": "Counterterrorism" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Unconventional warfare", "name": "Unconventional warfare" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc700839/", "id": "RS22373_2009Jun04", "date": "2009-06-04", "retrieved": "2015-08-27T16:20:31", "title": "Navy Role in Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report discusses the nature of Navy involvement in irregular warfare (IW) and counterterrorism (CT) operations, which have received an increased emphasis since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. The overall issue for Congress is how much emphasis to place on IW and CT activities in future Navy budgets, and whether decisions reached by Department of Defense (DOD) on this issue in the Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) are appropriate.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20090604_RS22373_bbb96491616799459cbd867c1d0e6122f5e5b95f.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20090604_RS22373_bbb96491616799459cbd867c1d0e6122f5e5b95f.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense policy", "name": "Defense policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Navy", "name": "Navy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Unconventional warfare", "name": "Unconventional warfare" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Counterterrorism", "name": "Counterterrorism" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc700653/", "id": "RS22373_2009Apr29", "date": "2009-04-29", "retrieved": "2015-08-27T16:20:31", "title": "Navy Role in Irregular Warfare and Counterterrorism: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report discusses the nature of Navy involvement in irregular warfare (IW) and counterterrorism (CT) operations, which have received an increased emphasis since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. The overall issue for Congress is how much emphasis to place on IW and CT activities in future Navy budgets, and whether decisions reached by Department of Defense (DOD) on this issue in the Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) are appropriate.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20090429_RS22373_519abfa093538b0cd5a6386da6fe4c4db0964b2a.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20090429_RS22373_519abfa093538b0cd5a6386da6fe4c4db0964b2a.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense policy", "name": "Defense policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Navy", "name": "Navy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Unconventional warfare", "name": "Unconventional warfare" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Counterterrorism", "name": "Counterterrorism" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc795495/", "id": "RS22373_2009Jan09", "date": "2009-01-09", "retrieved": "2016-01-13T14:26:20", "title": "Navy Role in Counterterrorism and Irregular Warfare: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report discusses the nature of Navy involvement in irregular warfare (IW) and counterterrorism (CT) operations. The Navy's role in CT and IW raises several potential oversight issues for Congress.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20090109_RS22373_465f5a106005701d5481ca145193d01cc6cc15b3.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20090109_RS22373_465f5a106005701d5481ca145193d01cc6cc15b3.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense policy", "name": "Defense policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Navy", "name": "Navy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Unconventional warfare", "name": "Unconventional warfare" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Counterterrorism", "name": "Counterterrorism" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc809025/", "id": "RS22373_2008Sep11", "date": "2008-09-11", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Navy Role in Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) \u2014 Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20080911_RS22373_141c61ed629b7c07eb524141b9b27f0ebae4f523.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20080911_RS22373_141c61ed629b7c07eb524141b9b27f0ebae4f523.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs10659/", "id": "RS22373_2008Jul08", "date": "2008-07-08", "retrieved": "2008-12-11T20:31:53", "title": "Navy Role in Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) -- Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "The Navy for several years has carried out a variety of activities related to what the Administration refers to as the Global War on Terrorism (GWOT). The Navy states that as of February 2008, more than 11,300 Navy sailors (including Individual Augmentees) were ashore supporting ground forces in the U.S. Central Command region (including Iraq and Afghanistan). The Navy's role in the GWOT raises several potential oversight issues for Congress.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20080708_RS22373_dc6bce8cecf18fb74d553d860a180bb98f6125ae.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20080708_RS22373_dc6bce8cecf18fb74d553d860a180bb98f6125ae.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Navy - U.S.", "name": "Navy - U.S." }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense policy", "name": "Defense policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Criminal justice", "name": "Criminal justice" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "International affairs", "name": "International affairs" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Terrorism", "name": "Terrorism" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs10660/", "id": "RS22373_2008May29", "date": "2008-05-29", "retrieved": "2008-12-11T20:31:53", "title": "Navy Role in Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) -- Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "The Navy for several years has carried out a variety of activities related to what the Administration refers to as the Global War on Terrorism (GWOT). The Navy states that as of February 2008, more than 11,300 Navy sailors (including Individual Augmentees) were ashore supporting ground forces in the U.S. Central Command region (including Iraq and Afghanistan). The Navy's role in the GWOT raises several potential oversight issues for Congress.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20080529_RS22373_3f2d6f83b25bebe5b97240c24552a379cbb0fbf6.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20080529_RS22373_3f2d6f83b25bebe5b97240c24552a379cbb0fbf6.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Navy - U.S.", "name": "Navy - U.S." }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense policy", "name": "Defense policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Criminal justice", "name": "Criminal justice" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "International affairs", "name": "International affairs" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Terrorism", "name": "Terrorism" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc814901/", "id": "RS22373_2008Mar03", "date": "2008-03-03", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Navy Role in Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) \u2014 Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20080303_RS22373_2e9abb054bc795c534ea905787338e7594a6ac18.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20080303_RS22373_2e9abb054bc795c534ea905787338e7594a6ac18.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc810444/", "id": "RS22373_2007Apr16", "date": "2007-04-16", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Navy Role in Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) \u2014 Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20070416_RS22373_847ba64a8c3d66817413d58e1eb71fa0e4cc8c39.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20070416_RS22373_847ba64a8c3d66817413d58e1eb71fa0e4cc8c39.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc816064/", "id": "RS22373_2006Oct25", "date": "2006-10-25", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Navy Role in Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) \u2014 Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20061025_RS22373_b5758f5591393fa17c467db7492093240cb26a0e.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20061025_RS22373_b5758f5591393fa17c467db7492093240cb26a0e.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs10853/", "id": "RS22373 2006-02-06", "date": "2006-02-06", "retrieved": "2006-08-21T16:44:25", "title": "Navy Role in Global War on Terrorism (GWOT): Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20060206_RS22373_e6fac485bd929bd819d9eada3f3ff1a3f534be10.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20060206_RS22373_e6fac485bd929bd819d9eada3f3ff1a3f534be10.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense policy", "name": "Defense policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval operations", "name": "Naval operations" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Navy - U.S.", "name": "Navy - U.S." }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Terrorism", "name": "Terrorism" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "War", "name": "War" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Criminal justice", "name": "Criminal justice" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "International affairs", "name": "International affairs" } ] } ], "topics": [ "Foreign Affairs", "Intelligence and National Security", "National Defense" ] }