{
  "id": "RS22454",
  "type": "CRS Report",
  "typeId": "REPORTS",
  "number": "RS22454",
  "active": false,
  "source": "EveryCRSReport.com, University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
  "versions": [
    {
      "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
      "id": 376546,
      "date": "2011-01-18",
      "retrieved": "2016-04-07T01:09:54.919059",
      "title": "DOD Leases of Foreign-Built Ships: Background for Congress",
      "summary": "Prior to the enactment of the FY2008 defense authorization act (H.R. 4986/P.L. 110-181 of January 28, 2008), 10 U.S.C. \u00a72401 stated DOD may not lease a vessel or aircraft for a period of more than five years unless it is specifically authorized by law to make such a lease. Operating under this provision, the Department of Defense (DOD) in recent years used lease options and renewals to lease some foreign-built cargo ships for total periods of almost 10 years\u2014a length of time that some observers argue effectively circumvented a legal requirement that U.S. military ships be built in U.S. shipyards. These observers, particularly the American Shipbuilding Association (ASA), proposed reducing the current five-year legal limit on ship leases to two years for foreign-built ships. DOD opposed the idea, arguing that its ship leases are the most cost-effective way to meet its needs for the ships in question.\nSection 1011 of the FY2008 defense authorization act amended 10 U.S.C. \u00a72401 to permit the Secretary of a military department to lease a vessel for a period of greater than two years, but less than five years, only if the Secretary provides a notification of the lease to the House and Senate Armed Services and Appropriations committees (including a detailed description of its terms, a justification for entering it rather than purchasing the vessel, a determination that entering into it is the most cost-effective option, and a plan for meeting the requirement upon the lease\u2019s completion), and a period of 30 days of continuous session of Congress has expired.\nThe explanatory statement on the final version of the FY2010 DOD appropriations act (H.R. 3326/P.L. 111-118 of December 19, 2009) directed the Navy to update its March 2008 report on the leasing of foreign-built ships and address impacts on American seafarers, sealift capabilities, and naval shipbuilding.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORTS",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "encoding": "utf-8",
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RS22454",
          "sha1": "4619fc45aea4228facccfc19233d469b1ba43490",
          "filename": "files/20110118_RS22454_4619fc45aea4228facccfc19233d469b1ba43490.html",
          "images": null
        },
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "encoding": null,
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RS22454",
          "sha1": "af97da4823971b3f8b4ae7a40dc3dcbd8b604b5a",
          "filename": "files/20110118_RS22454_af97da4823971b3f8b4ae7a40dc3dcbd8b604b5a.pdf",
          "images": null
        }
      ],
      "topics": []
    },
    {
      "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
      "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc29745/",
      "id": "RS22454_2010Sep28",
      "date": "2010-09-28",
      "retrieved": "2010-12-04T14:26:25",
      "title": "DOD Leases of Foreign-Built Ships: Background for Congress",
      "summary": "The Department of Defense (DOD) in recent years has leased some foreign-built cargo ships for total periods, including options and renewals, of almost 10 years -- a length of time that some observers argue effectively circumvents a legal requirement that U.S. military ships be built in U.S. shipyards. These observers, particularly the American Shipbuilding Association (ASA), have proposed reducing the current five-year legal limit on ship leases to two years for foreign-built ships. DOD has opposed the idea, arguing that its ship leases are the most cost-effective way to meet its needs for the ships in question. This report briefly discusses this issue, as well as related legislation.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORT",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "filename": "files/20100928_RS22454_fa9ca62171b6d50fa9aebbf13cb5fe0109e72859.pdf"
        },
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "filename": "files/20100928_RS22454_fa9ca62171b6d50fa9aebbf13cb5fe0109e72859.html"
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Defense policy",
          "name": "Defense policy"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Leases",
          "name": "Leases"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Business",
          "name": "Business"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Defense economics",
          "name": "Defense economics"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Military and naval supplies",
          "name": "Military and naval supplies"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Transportation",
          "name": "Transportation"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Shipyards",
          "name": "Shipyards"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
      "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc501926/",
      "id": "RS22454_2010Jun10",
      "date": "2010-06-10",
      "retrieved": "2015-03-30T22:03:27",
      "title": "DOD Leases of Foreign-Built Ships: Background for Congress",
      "summary": "This report briefly discusses the Department of Defense leasing foreign-built ships, the opponents of this practice, and related legislation.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORT",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "filename": "files/20100610_RS22454_43a144cdc0df10a98a433fd1725441e90d885a31.pdf"
        },
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "filename": "files/20100610_RS22454_43a144cdc0df10a98a433fd1725441e90d885a31.html"
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Business",
          "name": "Business"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Defense economics",
          "name": "Defense economics"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Defense policy",
          "name": "Defense policy"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Military and naval supplies",
          "name": "Military and naval supplies"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Shipyards",
          "name": "Shipyards"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Leases",
          "name": "Leases"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
      "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc501622/",
      "id": "RS22454_2010May28",
      "date": "2010-05-28",
      "retrieved": "2015-03-30T22:03:27",
      "title": "DOD Leases of Foreign-Built Ships: Background for Congress",
      "summary": "This report briefly discusses the Department of Defense leases of foreign-built ships, the opponents of this practice, and related legislation.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORT",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "filename": "files/20100528_RS22454_14f8ba2ad607f4a86076be219e2d845c81b832e0.pdf"
        },
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "filename": "files/20100528_RS22454_14f8ba2ad607f4a86076be219e2d845c81b832e0.html"
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Business",
          "name": "Business"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Defense economics",
          "name": "Defense economics"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Defense policy",
          "name": "Defense policy"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Leases",
          "name": "Leases"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Military and naval supplies",
          "name": "Military and naval supplies"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Shipyards",
          "name": "Shipyards"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
      "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc503490/",
      "id": "RS22454_2010Mar30",
      "date": "2010-03-30",
      "retrieved": "2015-04-30T17:37:21",
      "title": "DOD Leases of Foreign-Built Ships: Background for Congress",
      "summary": "This report briefly discusses the Department of Defense leasing foreign-built ships, the opponents of this practice, and related legislation.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORT",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "filename": "files/20100330_RS22454_a98291d680b370cfcc9b0b3c5f42a8c7d2d0dc40.pdf"
        },
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "filename": "files/20100330_RS22454_a98291d680b370cfcc9b0b3c5f42a8c7d2d0dc40.html"
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Defense economics",
          "name": "Defense economics"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Defense policy",
          "name": "Defense policy"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Leases",
          "name": "Leases"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Military and naval supplies",
          "name": "Military and naval supplies"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Shipyards",
          "name": "Shipyards"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Transportation",
          "name": "Transportation"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
      "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc627101/",
      "id": "RS22454_2009Dec22",
      "date": "2009-12-22",
      "retrieved": "2015-06-15T14:46:40",
      "title": "DOD Leases of Foreign-Built Ships: Background for Congress",
      "summary": "This report briefly discusses the Department of Defense leasing foreign-built ships, the opponents of this practice, and related legislation.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORT",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "filename": "files/20091222_RS22454_aea599c268752bfdff88979e84cda9adc56a4500.pdf"
        },
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "filename": "files/20091222_RS22454_aea599c268752bfdff88979e84cda9adc56a4500.html"
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Defense economics",
          "name": "Defense economics"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Defense policy",
          "name": "Defense policy"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Leases",
          "name": "Leases"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Military and naval supplies",
          "name": "Military and naval supplies"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Shipyards",
          "name": "Shipyards"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Transportation",
          "name": "Transportation"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
      "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc689174/",
      "id": "RS22454_2009Oct22",
      "date": "2009-11-22",
      "retrieved": "2015-08-03T15:06:47",
      "title": "DOD Leases of Foreign-Built Ships: Background for Congress",
      "summary": "This report briefly discusses the Department of Defense leasing foreign-built ships, the opponents of this practice, and related legislation.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORT",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "filename": "files/20091122_RS22454_428fc861e63f6a7d98ef292a0b44303185c2d31e.pdf"
        },
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "filename": "files/20091122_RS22454_428fc861e63f6a7d98ef292a0b44303185c2d31e.html"
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Defense economics",
          "name": "Defense economics"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Defense policy",
          "name": "Defense policy"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Leases",
          "name": "Leases"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Military and naval supplies",
          "name": "Military and naval supplies"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Shipyards",
          "name": "Shipyards"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
      "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc689114/",
      "id": "RS22454_2009Sep17",
      "date": "2009-09-17",
      "retrieved": "2015-08-03T15:06:47",
      "title": "DOD Leases of Foreign-Built Ships: Background for Congress",
      "summary": "This report briefly discusses the Department of Defense leasing foreign-built ships, the opponents of this practice, and related legislation.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORT",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "filename": "files/20090917_RS22454_09b9b8d840e95d094d48e1b1869d2e391a977c2f.pdf"
        },
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "filename": "files/20090917_RS22454_09b9b8d840e95d094d48e1b1869d2e391a977c2f.html"
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Defense economics",
          "name": "Defense economics"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Defense policy",
          "name": "Defense policy"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Leases",
          "name": "Leases"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Military and naval supplies",
          "name": "Military and naval supplies"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Shipyards",
          "name": "Shipyards"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Transportation",
          "name": "Transportation"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
      "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs10676/",
      "id": "RS22454_2008Oct31",
      "date": "2008-10-31",
      "retrieved": "2008-12-11T20:31:58",
      "title": "DOD Leases of Foreign-Built Ships: Background for Congress",
      "summary": "The Department of Defense (DOD) in recent years has leased some foreign-built cargo ships for total periods, including options and renewals, of almost 10 years - a length of time that some observers argue effectively circumvents a legal requirement that U.S. military ships be built in U.S. shipyards. These observers, particularly the\r\nAmerican Shipbuilding Association (ASA), have proposed reducing the current five-year legal limit on ship leases to two years for foreign-built ships. DOD has opposed the idea, arguing that its ship leases are the most cost-effective way to meet its needs for the ships in question.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORT",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "filename": "files/20081031_RS22454_55906b238579de092363524a6f336090955ee1b9.pdf"
        },
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "filename": "files/20081031_RS22454_55906b238579de092363524a6f336090955ee1b9.html"
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Defense policy",
          "name": "Defense policy"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Leases",
          "name": "Leases"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Business",
          "name": "Business"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Defense economics",
          "name": "Defense economics"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Military and naval supplies",
          "name": "Military and naval supplies"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Transportation",
          "name": "Transportation"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Shipyards",
          "name": "Shipyards"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
      "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs10675/",
      "id": "RS22454_2008Oct03",
      "date": "2008-10-03",
      "retrieved": "2008-12-11T20:31:57",
      "title": "DOD Leases of Foreign-Built Ships: Background for Congress",
      "summary": "The Department of Defense (DOD) in recent years has leased some foreign-built cargo ships for total periods, including options and renewals, of almost 10 years - a length of time that some observers argue effectively circumvents a legal requirement that U.S. military ships be built in U.S. shipyards. These observers, particularly the\r\nAmerican Shipbuilding Association (ASA), have proposed reducing the current five-year legal limit on ship leases to two years for foreign-built ships. DOD has opposed the idea, arguing that its ship leases are the most cost-effective way to meet its needs for the ships in question.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORT",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "filename": "files/20081003_RS22454_7fa39e5774c985cf9ed2fe60fad7a3985128ee15.pdf"
        },
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "filename": "files/20081003_RS22454_7fa39e5774c985cf9ed2fe60fad7a3985128ee15.html"
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Defense policy",
          "name": "Defense policy"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Leases",
          "name": "Leases"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Business",
          "name": "Business"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Defense economics",
          "name": "Defense economics"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Military and naval supplies",
          "name": "Military and naval supplies"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Transportation",
          "name": "Transportation"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Shipyards",
          "name": "Shipyards"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
      "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs10674/",
      "id": "RS22454_2008May22",
      "date": "2008-05-22",
      "retrieved": "2008-12-11T20:31:57",
      "title": "DOD Leases of Foreign-Built Ships: Background for Congress",
      "summary": "The Department of Defense (DOD) in recent years has leased some foreign-built cargo ships for total periods, including options and renewals, of almost 10 years - a length of time that some observers argue effectively circumvents a legal requirement that U.S. military ships be built in U.S. shipyards. These observers, particularly the\r\nAmerican Shipbuilding Association (ASA), have proposed reducing the current five-year legal limit on ship leases to two years for foreign-built ships. DOD has opposed the idea, arguing that its ship leases are the most cost-effective way to meet its needs for the ships in question.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORT",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "filename": "files/20080522_RS22454_dfe6d3cf234e05e08c33d47e6fea59f6e34b595b.pdf"
        },
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "filename": "files/20080522_RS22454_dfe6d3cf234e05e08c33d47e6fea59f6e34b595b.html"
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Defense policy",
          "name": "Defense policy"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Leases",
          "name": "Leases"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Business",
          "name": "Business"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Defense economics",
          "name": "Defense economics"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Military and naval supplies",
          "name": "Military and naval supplies"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Transportation",
          "name": "Transportation"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Shipyards",
          "name": "Shipyards"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Appropriations"
  ]
}