{
  "id": "RS22631",
  "type": "CRS Report",
  "typeId": "REPORTS",
  "number": "RS22631",
  "active": false,
  "source": "EveryCRSReport.com, University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
  "versions": [
    {
      "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
      "id": 372038,
      "date": "2010-10-08",
      "retrieved": "2016-04-07T01:25:55.045062",
      "title": "Defense Acquisition: Use of Lead System Integrators (LSIs)\u2014Background, Oversight Issues, and Options for Congress",
      "summary": "Some in Congress have expressed concern about the government\u2019s use of private-sector lead system integrators (LSIs) for executing large, complex, defense-related acquisition programs. LSIs are large, prime contractors hired to manage such programs. Supporters of the LSI concept argue that it is needed to execute such complex acquisition efforts, and can promote better technical oversight and innovation. Two LSI-managed programs\u2014the U.S. Army\u2019s Future Combat System (FCS) and the U.S. Coast Guard\u2019s Deepwater program\u2014have been strongly criticized by some observers because of cost and schedule overruns, and the potential for possible conflicts of interest. The Army cancelled the FCS program in 2009 and the replacement programs do not use an LSI. Public Law (P.L.) 111-23, the Weapons System Acquisition Reform Act of 2009, required the Secretary of Defense to revise the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to reflect any organizational conflicts of interest that may arise from the use of private-sector LSIs. On September 30, 2010, the House and Senate conferees for the proposed Fiscal Year 2010 and 2011 Coast Guard Authorization Act resolved their differences and the bill was sent to the President on October 4, 2010. One provision in the bill, Section 564, would prohibit the use of lead system integrators within the Coast Guard, with some exceptions, and would require the use of full and open competition for any future acquisition contract.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORTS",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "encoding": "utf-8",
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RS22631",
          "sha1": "e84f61bbea5978d55439ff3aa9de3af300736a1c",
          "filename": "files/20101008_RS22631_e84f61bbea5978d55439ff3aa9de3af300736a1c.html",
          "images": null
        },
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "encoding": null,
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RS22631",
          "sha1": "420d97eb91af9dd0113e94e1789eeb8d6f5010d6",
          "filename": "files/20101008_RS22631_420d97eb91af9dd0113e94e1789eeb8d6f5010d6.pdf",
          "images": null
        }
      ],
      "topics": []
    },
    {
      "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
      "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc815960/",
      "id": "RS22631_2009Sep10",
      "date": "2009-09-10",
      "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26",
      "title": "Defense Acquisition: Use of Lead System Integrators (LSIs)\u2014Background, Oversight Issues, and Options for Congress",
      "summary": null,
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORT",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "filename": "files/20090910_RS22631_ed9af82c698c0ca3fe0d0a239450c54ab845b269.pdf"
        },
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "filename": "files/20090910_RS22631_ed9af82c698c0ca3fe0d0a239450c54ab845b269.html"
        }
      ],
      "topics": []
    },
    {
      "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
      "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc795820/",
      "id": "RS22631_2009Feb10",
      "date": "2009-02-10",
      "retrieved": "2016-01-13T14:26:20",
      "title": "Defense Acquisition: Use of Lead System Integrators (LSIs) - Background, Oversight Issues, and Options for Congress",
      "summary": "This report discusses the debate surrounding the government's use of private-sector lead system integrators (LSIs) for executing large, complex, defense-related acquisition programs, as well as related legislation.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORT",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "filename": "files/20090210_RS22631_8f21c869e5ef68b76d76bec05ea40a22f12477c1.pdf"
        },
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "filename": "files/20090210_RS22631_8f21c869e5ef68b76d76bec05ea40a22f12477c1.html"
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Defense economics",
          "name": "Defense economics"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Public contracts",
          "name": "Public contracts"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Defense procurement",
          "name": "Defense procurement"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Military and naval supplies",
          "name": "Military and naval supplies"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Defense contracts",
          "name": "Defense contracts"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
      "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs10700/",
      "id": "RS22631_2008Oct22",
      "date": "2008-10-22",
      "retrieved": "2008-12-11T20:32:04",
      "title": "Defense Acquisition: Use of Lead System Integrators (LSIs) -- Background, Oversight Issues, and Options for Congress",
      "summary": "Some in Congress have expressed concern about the government's use of private-sector lead system integrators (LSIs) for executing large, complex, defense-related acquisition programs. LSIs are large, prime contractors hired to manage such programs. Supporters of the LSI concept argue that it is needed to execute such complex acquisition efforts, and can promote better technical oversight and innovation.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORT",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "filename": "files/20081022_RS22631_5b3242c0749eb2fec8e5c8440cd62afe889fe1d5.pdf"
        },
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "filename": "files/20081022_RS22631_5b3242c0749eb2fec8e5c8440cd62afe889fe1d5.html"
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Defense economics",
          "name": "Defense economics"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Public contracts",
          "name": "Public contracts"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Defense procurement",
          "name": "Defense procurement"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Military and naval supplies",
          "name": "Military and naval supplies"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Defense contracts",
          "name": "Defense contracts"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
      "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs10698/",
      "id": "RS22631_2008Aug20",
      "date": "2008-08-20",
      "retrieved": "2008-12-11T20:32:04",
      "title": "Defense Acquisition: Use of Lead System Integrators (LSIs) -- Background, Oversight Issues, and Options for Congress",
      "summary": "Some in Congress have expressed concern about the government's use of private-sector lead system integrators (LSIs) for executing large, complex, defense-related acquisition programs. LSIs are large, prime contractors hired to manage such programs. Supporters of the LSI concept argue that it is needed to execute such complex acquisition efforts, and can promote better technical oversight and innovation.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORT",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "filename": "files/20080820_RS22631_e9f50bc792dcb424ad001444dd88d097e848535c.pdf"
        },
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "filename": "files/20080820_RS22631_e9f50bc792dcb424ad001444dd88d097e848535c.html"
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Defense economics",
          "name": "Defense economics"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Public contracts",
          "name": "Public contracts"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Defense procurement",
          "name": "Defense procurement"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Military and naval supplies",
          "name": "Military and naval supplies"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Defense contracts",
          "name": "Defense contracts"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
      "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs10699/",
      "id": "RS22631_2008Jun06",
      "date": "2008-06-06",
      "retrieved": "2008-12-11T20:32:04",
      "title": "Defense Acquisition: Use of Lead System Integrators (LSIs) -- Background, Oversight Issues, and Options for Congress",
      "summary": "Some in Congress have expressed concern about the government's use of private-sector lead system integrators (LSIs) for executing large, complex, defense-related acquisition programs. LSIs are large, prime contractors hired to manage such programs. Supporters of the LSI concept argue that it is needed to execute such complex acquisition efforts, and can promote better technical oversight and innovation.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORT",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "filename": "files/20080606_RS22631_331922301d7a3edd323bb634f8d55537b1fafcd5.pdf"
        },
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "filename": "files/20080606_RS22631_331922301d7a3edd323bb634f8d55537b1fafcd5.html"
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Defense economics",
          "name": "Defense economics"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Public contracts",
          "name": "Public contracts"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Defense procurement",
          "name": "Defense procurement"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Military and naval supplies",
          "name": "Military and naval supplies"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Defense contracts",
          "name": "Defense contracts"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
      "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc819528/",
      "id": "RS22631_2007Mar26",
      "date": "2007-03-26",
      "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26",
      "title": "Defense Acquisition: Use of Lead System Integrators (LSIs) \u2014 Background, Oversight Issues, and Options for Congress",
      "summary": null,
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORT",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "filename": "files/20070326_RS22631_813c204974a8ee5b45ad56274eb025af57aa8961.pdf"
        },
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "filename": "files/20070326_RS22631_813c204974a8ee5b45ad56274eb025af57aa8961.html"
        }
      ],
      "topics": []
    }
  ],
  "topics": [
    "National Defense"
  ]
}