Final Rule on Industry-Recognized 
November 23, 2020 
Apprenticeship Programs 
Benjamin Collins 
In March 2020, the Department of Labor (DOL) published a final rule establishing policies 
Analyst in Labor Policy 
related to its Industry-Recognized Apprenticeship Programs (IRAPs). The rule established 
  
criteria and procedures for DOL to approve Standards Recognition Entities (SREs), which have 
the authority to recognize IRAPs. The standards that SREs will apply to IRAPs are established in 
 
the rule. The rule defines an IRAP as a workforce training program that includes a paid-work 
component and an educational or instructional component and results in an industry-recognized credential. 
The final rule was established under the authority of the National Apprenticeship Act (NAA). The rule supplements 
previously established regulations related to apprenticeship. It has no direct effect on the existing registered apprenticeship 
system. 
The rule establishes procedures for DOL to approve SREs as qualified to recognize IRAPs. Entities that can become SREs 
include (but are not limited to) trade, industry, and employer groups; corporations; educational institutions; state and local 
government agencies; nonprofit organizations; and unions. In their applications, SREs must establish their expertise and 
ability to set standards in their specified occupations and industries. SREs must also establish impartiality on several fronts, 
including mitigating any conflicts of interest. The rule specifies that DOL shall recognize any SRE that applies and meets the 
regulatory criteria. 
Once approved, an SRE may recognize IRAPs that comply with the standards established in the rule. The standards for 
IRAPs include a paid-work component, an instructional component, written training plans and apprenticeship agreements, 
various disclosures to the apprentice, and reporting requirements to DOL. 
Recognition as an SRE does not entitle an entity to federal funding. Similarly, IRAPs do not necessarily receive federal 
funds. IRAPs may qualify for federal funds through various existing federal programs that support workforce development, 
although unlike registered apprenticeship status, their status as IRAPs does not provide categorical eligibility for certain types 
of federal aid. 
 
Congressional Research Service 
 
 link to page 4  link to page 4  link to page 4  link to page 5  link to page 5  link to page 6  link to page 7  link to page 8  link to page 8  link to page 8  link to page 9  link to page 9  link to page 10  link to page 10  link to page 10  link to page 11 Final Rule on Industry-Recognized Apprenticeship Programs 
 
Contents 
Introduction and Background ............................................................................................ 1 
Legislative Background and the Registered Apprenticeship System ................................... 1 
Prior Actions Related to Industry-Recognized Apprenticeship Programs ............................ 1 
Description of the Final Rule ............................................................................................ 2 
Standards Recognition Entities (SREs).......................................................................... 2 
Requirements for IRAPs ............................................................................................. 3 
Reporting Requirements ............................................................................................. 4 
Oversight, Suspension, and Derecognition of SREs......................................................... 5 
Exclusion of Construction Activities ............................................................................. 5 
Implementation of the Final Rule....................................................................................... 5 
Comparison of Registered Apprenticeship Programs and IRAPs............................................. 6 
Structure and Duration of Programs.............................................................................. 6 
Schedule of Wage Increases ........................................................................................ 7 
Equal Employment Opportunity Provisions ................................................................... 7 
Integration with Other Federal Programs ....................................................................... 7 
 
Contacts 
Author Information ......................................................................................................... 8 
 
Congressional Research Service 
 
Final Rule on Industry-Recognized Apprenticeship Programs 
 
 
Introduction and Background 
On March 11, 2020, the Department of Labor (DOL) published a final rule in the Federal 
Register to establish a process for recognizing new Standards Recognition Entities (SREs) that 
have the authority to approve Industry-Recognized Apprenticeship Programs (IRAPs).1 The 
requirements that SREs may apply to IRAPs are established in the rule.  
The rule does not have a direct impact on DOL’s existing registered apprenticeship system, in 
which governmental agencies approve apprenticeship programs as being in compliance with 
federal standards. Instead, the new system of SREs and IRAPs may operate as an alternative 
system, co-existing with the established registered apprenticeship system.  
This report focuses on the final rule and provides limited information on the broader federal 
approach to apprenticeship. A more detailed description of established federal efforts related to 
registered apprenticeship is available  in CRS Report R45171, Registered Apprenticeship: Federal 
Role and Recent Federal Efforts. 
Legislative Background and the Registered Apprenticeship System 
The National Apprenticeship Act (NAA), enacted in 1937, is a relatively brief statute that directs 
DOL to “safeguard the welfare of apprentices” and “bring together employers and labor for the 
formulation of programs of apprenticeship.”2 To carry out this law, DOL established regulations 
that set standards for apprenticeship programs and procedures for registration agencies to register 
individual  apprenticeship programs that are in conformity with those standards (“registered 
apprenticeships”). Regulations also establish oversight responsibilities and procedures for 
registration agencies.3 The newly established IRAP regulations supplement the previously 
established registered apprenticeship regulations. A brief comparison of the two systems is 
provided at the end of this report. 
The emphasis of the NAA and associated regulations is on creating administrative systems that 
wil  support the objectives of the law. The NAA does not authorize grants or other appropriations 
to provide direct financial support for apprentices or apprenticeship sponsors.  
Prior Actions Related to Industry-Recognized Apprenticeship 
Programs 
The final rule is the latest in a series of ongoing efforts by the Trump Administration to increase 
the role of private industry in setting and implementing standards in the federal apprenticeship 
system. In June 2017, President Trump issued Executive Order (EO) 13801, “Expanding 
Apprenticeships in America.”4 The EO directed DOL to “consider proposing regulations” that 
                                              
1 T he full notice was published  as pages 14294-14392 in Vol. 85, No. 48 of the Federal Register (hereinafter, “ Federal 
Register notice”). See https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2020-03-11/pdf/2020-03605.pdf. 
2 29 U.S.C.  50 et seq. 
3 29 C.F.R. 29-30. 
4 For full  text of EO 13801, see https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2017-06-20/pdf/2017-13012.pdf. 
Congressional Research Servi ce 
1 
Final Rule on Industry-Recognized Apprenticeship Programs 
 
“reflect an assessment of whether” to modify the registration process to increase the role of 
nongovernment entities.  
The EO also directs DOL to convene a task force “to identify strategies and proposals to promote 
apprenticeships, especial y in sectors where apprenticeship programs are insufficient.” The first 
meeting of the task force was in October 2017 and its final report was issued in May 2018. The 
recommendations in the final report included the broad contours of an IRAP system.5 
DOL published a proposed rule related to IRAPs on July 25, 2019. The proposed rule specified 
that comments had to be submitted by August 26, 2019. 
Description of the Final Rule 
Under the final rule, the Office of Apprenticeship (OA) within DOL6 may approve SREs that 
meet specified requirements. The rule further establishes a process by which SREs may consider 
individual  apprenticeship programs in the context of standards established by the rule and 
formal y recognize individual  IRAPs that are in conformity with those standards. 
The final rule defines IRAPs as “high-quality apprenticeship programs, wherein an individual 
obtains workplace-relevant knowledge and progressively advancing skil s, that include a paid-
work component and an educational or instructional component, and that result in an industry-
recognized credential.”7 
Standards Recognition Entities (SREs) 
Under the final rule, DOL-approved SREs are responsible for approving programs that are in 
compliance with federal requirements. The rule specifies the types of entities that can become 
SREs: 
  trade, industry, and employer groups or associations;  
  corporations and other organized entities; 
  educational institutions, such as universities or community colleges;  
  state and local government agencies or entities;  
  nonprofit organizations;  
  unions; 
  joint labor-management organizations;  
  certification and accreditation bodies or entities for a profession or industry; or  
  a consortium or partnership of entities such as those listed above.8 
To apply to be an SRE, an entity (or consortium thereof) must submit an application to DOL. The 
application must demonstrate that the entity has sufficient expertise in the applicable industries or 
                                              
5 See  recommendations 14-26 of the final report, available at https://www.dol.gov/apprenticeship/docs/task-force-
apprenticeship-expansion-report.pdf. 
6 T he text of the final rule assigns  numerous administrative responsibilities to the administrator, wh ich is the chief 
official of DOL’s  Office of Apprenticeship. In the interest of simplicity and readability, this report will typically refer 
to “DOL” when the regulations refer to “the administrator” or an individual designated  by the administrator.  
7 29 C.F.R. 29.20(b). 
8 29 C.F.R. 29.20(a)(1). 
Congressional Research Service 
2 
Final Rule on Industry-Recognized Apprenticeship Programs 
 
occupational areas and that it has the capacity and resources to operate in its intended geographic 
area for a five-year period. 
In its application, a prospective SRE must establish policies and procedures that demonstrate 
impartiality  on several fronts. The SRE must actively mitigate any actual or potential conflict of 
interest, including those that may arise from an SRE recognizing its own apprenticeship programs 
and those related to the SRE’s provision of service to actual or potential IRAPs.9 
The regulations specify that DOL wil  recognize an SRE if it is qualified.10 If DOL does not 
approve the application, it must specify the reasons for denial and what remedies must be made 
for the application to be approved. 
If DOL approves an SRE’s application, the SRE wil  be recognized for five years. After five 
years, the SRE must submit an application for re-recognition. An SRE is required to notify DOL 
if it makes major changes that “material y affect the SRE’s ability to function in its recognition 
capacity” or if it seeks to recognize programs in additional industries, occupational areas, or 
geographic areas.11 
Requirements for IRAPs 
Under the final rule, an SRE may only recognize an IRAP if the program meets 10 
requirements.12 
1.  The program must train apprentices for employment in jobs that require 
specialized knowledge and experience and involve the performance of complex 
tasks. 
2.  The program has a written training plan that is consistent with the SRE’s 
requirements and standards and was developed through a consensus-based 
process involving industry experts. The plan, which must be provided to an 
apprentice prior to the beginning of the IRAP, must detail the IRAP’s structured 
work experiences, and appropriate classroom or related instruction, be designed 
so that apprentices demonstrate proficiency and earn credential(s), and provide 
apprentices progressively advancing industry-essential skil s. 
3.  The program ensures that, where appropriate, apprentices receive credit for prior 
knowledge and experience relevant to the instruction of the program. 
4.  The program provides apprentices with industry-recognized credential(s) during 
participation in or upon completion of the program. 
5.  The program provides a safe working environment for apprentices that adheres to 
al  applicable federal, state, and local safety laws and regulations along with any 
additional safety requirements of the SRE. 
6.  The program provides apprentices with structured mentorship opportunities 
throughout the duration of the apprenticeship that involve ongoing, focused 
supervision and training by experienced instructors and employees, to ensure 
they have additional guidance on the progress of their training and their 
employability. 
                                              
9 29 C.F.R. 29.21(b)(4)-(6). 
10 29 U.S.C.  22.21(c). 
11 29 U.S.C.  22.21(c)(1)-(3). 
12 Requirements are largely verbatim from 29 C.F.R. 29.22(a)(4). 
Congressional Research Service 
3 
Final Rule on Industry-Recognized Apprenticeship Programs 
 
7.  The program ensures that apprentices are paid at least the applicable  federal, 
state, or local minimum wage and ensures that the program’s charging of costs or 
expenses comply with al  applicable federal, state, and local wage laws and 
regulations. The program provides a written notice to apprentices of what wages 
they wil  receive and under what circumstances their wages wil  increase. 
8.  The program affirms its adherence to al  applicable  federal, state, and local laws 
pertaining to Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO). 
9.  The program discloses to apprentices, prior to when they agree to participate in 
the program, any costs or expenses that wil  be charged to them (such as costs 
related to tools or educational materials). 
10. The program maintains a written apprenticeship agreement for each apprentice 
that outlines the terms and conditions of the apprentice’s employment and 
training and is consistent with the SRE’s requirements. 
An SRE must establish its IRAPs’ conformity with the aforementioned requirements at the time 
of recognition and on an annual basis thereafter.13 The regulations further specify that an SRE 
must “maintain an ongoing quality-control relationship with IRAPs it has recognized” and that 
such relationship shal  “involve periodic compliance reviews … to ensure compliance” with the 
previously listed standards.14 
Reporting Requirements 
The final rule requires DOL to make publicly available  a list of SREs and the IRAPs that they 
have recognized.15 The rule does not specify how often this list must be updated. 
The rule requires SREs to report to DOL and make publicly available,  on an annual basis, 
information on each program they recognize, including the following:16 
  up-to-date contact information for each program; 
  the total number of new and continuing apprentices in each IRAP under an 
apprenticeship agreement; 
  the total number of apprentices who successfully completed the IRAP annual y; 
  the annual completion rate for apprentices;17 
  the median length of time for program completion; 
  the post-apprenticeship employment retention rate, calculated 6 and 12 months 
after program completion; 
  the industry-recognized credentials attained by apprentices in an IRAP, and the 
annual number of such credentials attained; 
                                              
13 29 C.F.R. 29.22(b). 
14 29 C.F.R. 29.22(f). 
15 T he list must also include  suspended  and derecognized  IRAPs. 29 C.F.R.  29.24. 
16 29 C.F.R. 29.22(h). 
17 Regulations specify that “Annual completion rate must be calculated by comparing the number of apprentices in a 
designated  apprenticeship cohort who successfully  completed the IRAP requirements and attained an industry-
recognized credential with the number of apprentices in that cohort who initially began  training in the IRAP.” 29 
C.F.R.  29.22(h)(4). 
Congressional Research Service 
4 
Final Rule on Industry-Recognized Apprenticeship Programs 
 
  the annualized average earnings of an IRAP’s former apprentices, calculated over 
the six-month period after IRAP completion; 
  training cost per apprentice; and 
  basic demographic information on participants. 
Oversight, Suspension, and Derecognition of SREs 
Regulations specify that DOL may “conduct periodic compliance assistance reviews of SREs to 
ascertain their conformity with” the requirements of the rules.18 DOL may also initiate a review of 
an SRE if a complaint is filed or if DOL receives other information indicating that the SRE is not 
in compliance with the regulations or is otherwise no longer capable of continuing as an SRE.19 
Upon conclusion of the review, DOL may decide to take no action or suspend the SRE for 45 
calendar days. If the SRE remedies the issues that led to the suspension, the suspension wil  end. 
If the SRE does not remedy the issues “after the close of the 45-day period and any extensions … 
[DOL] wil  derecognize the SRE and must notify the SRE in writing and specify the reasons for 
the derecognition.”20 
Following a SRE’s derecognition, an IRAP that has been recognized by the SRE is to maintain its 
status for one year. At the end of one year, the IRAP wil  lose its status unless it is recognized by 
another SRE.21 
Exclusion of Construction Activities 
The rule states an intention of creating an additional  option for occupations and industries that do 
not make wide use of the existing registered apprenticeship system. As such, “programs that seek 
to train apprentices to perform construction activities” are excluded from being recognized as 
IRAP programs. The rule specifies that SREs are prohibited from recognizing IRAPs that seek to 
train apprentices to perform construction activities and that DOL wil  not recognize SREs that 
intend to recognize programs in construction activities. The rule defines construction activities as 
the “erecting of buildings and other structures (including additions); heavy construction other 
than buildings; and alterations, reconstruction, instal ation, and maintenance and repairs.”22 
Implementation of the Final Rule 
The final rule took effect May 11, 2020, two months after it was issued. DOL began accepting 
online applications from prospective SREs that day.23 On September 23, 2020, DOL announced 
the first group of SREs. DOL noted that 18 SREs had been approved to recognize IRAPs in 20 
industries and nearly 130 occupations.24 
                                              
18 29 C.F.R. 29.23. 
19 29 C.F.R. 29.25-26. 
20 29 C.F.R. 29.27(c)(1)(ii). 
21 29 C.F.R. 29.28. 
22 29 C.F.R. 29.30. 
23 U.S.  Department of Labor, “U.S. Department of Labor Launches Industry -Recognized Apprenticeship Program 
Standards  Recognition Entity Application Portal,” May 11, 2020, https://www.dol.gov/newsroom/releases/eta/
eta20200511-0. 
24 U.S.  Department of Labor, “U.S. Department of Labor Announces First Group of Standards  Recognition Entities for 
Congressional Research Service 
5 
Final Rule on Industry-Recognized Apprenticeship Programs 
 
When it announced the initial  group of SREs, DOL said that additional  SRE applications wil  be 
reviewed on a quarterly basis. To be considered for the next review cycle, applications are due by 
November 30, 2020, and determinations are to be made within about 90 days of that date.25 
On October 1, 2020, DOL announced the recognition of the first IRAP program.26 
Comparison of Registered Apprenticeship Programs 
and IRAPs 
The final IRAP rule is frequently discussed in the context of the existing registered apprenticeship 
system that it supplements. The structure and design of the regulations governing registered 
apprenticeship are not directly paral el  to the rule for SREs and IRAPs, so direct comparisons of 
many aspects of the respective frameworks are chal enging. For example, in some instances the 
registered apprenticeship regulations establish a standard that is specific to registered 
apprenticeship programs while IRAPs may be silent on the issue and defer to federal policies that 
apply to al  workers. 
This section of the report highlights some differences between the existing registered 
apprenticeship regulations and the IRAP rule. It should not be considered a comprehensive 
comparison. 
Structure and Duration of Programs 
The existing registered apprenticeship regulations specify that programs can be time-based (i.e., 
an apprentice establishes competency by spending a specified amount of time on the skil ), 
competency-based (i.e., an apprentice establishes a skil  acquisition through demonstration of the 
skil  as verified by the sponsor), or a hybrid of the two. The IRAP rule does not explicitly limit 
IRAPs to competency-based programs, but it does specify that SREs must demonstrate “expertise 
to competency-based standards.”27 The explanatory text accompanying the IRAP rule clarify a 
requirement for competency-based standards, but further note that “SREs are not precluded from 
including time-based requirements as a function of or in addition to competency-based 
standards.”28 
The existing registered apprenticeship regulations define an eligible  occupation as one that, 
among other requirements, requires the attainment of skil s and knowledge for which at least 
2,000 hours of on-the-job training would be necessary.29 The IRAP rule does not include any 
provisions related to the expected or minimum duration of an IRAP. Similarly, the registered 
apprenticeship regulations establish a minimum of 144 hours per year of related instruction, while 
                                              
Industry-Recognized Apprenticeship Programs,” September 23, 2020, https://www.dol.gov/newsroom/releases/eta/
eta20200923. 
25 Ibid. 
26 U.S.  Department of Labor, “U.S. Department of Labor Announces First Industry -Recognized Apprenticeship 
Program,” October 1, 2020, https://www.dol.gov/newsroom/releases/eta/eta20201001-0. 
27 29 C.F.R. 29.21(b)(1). 
28 Federal Register  notice, p. 14388. 
29 29 C.F.R. 29.4. 
Congressional Research Service 
6 
Final Rule on Industry-Recognized Apprenticeship Programs 
 
IRAP regulations specify a requirement for related instruction but do not establish a minimum 
amount of time.30 
The existing registered apprenticeship regulations do not require sponsors to have a system to 
evaluate and recognize an apprentice’s prior knowledge and experience. The IRAP rule requires 
industry programs to demonstrate that apprentices receive credit for prior knowledge and 
experience.31 
Schedule of Wage Increases 
Both the registered apprenticeship regulations and the IRAP regulations establish that apprentices 
must be paid at least the federal minimum wage (or higher if specified by state or local law). The 
registered apprenticeship regulations further require “[a] progressively increasing schedule of 
wages to be paid to the apprentice consistent with the skil  acquired.”32 The IRAP rule requires 
that IRAP sponsors “provide a written notice to apprentices of what wages apprentices wil  
receive and under what circumstances apprentices’ wages wil  increase.”33 
Equal Employment Opportunity Provisions 
Registered apprenticeship programs are subject to a dedicated set of EEO regulations in 29 C.F.R. 
30. The IRAP rule requires IRAP programs to affirm their “adherence to al  applicable Federal, 
State, and local laws pertaining to Equal Employment Opportunity” but are not subject to 
apprenticeship-specific EEO policies.34 
Integration with Other Federal Programs 
While registered apprenticeship programs do not necessarily qualify for federal funds, there are a 
number of federal funding streams for which registered apprenticeship is an al owable use and 
registered apprenticeship programs may receive special consideration.35 For example, registered 
apprenticeship programs are automatical y eligible  for state formula grant funds under the 
Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA).36 Similarly, registered apprenticeship 
programs are “deemed approved” for the GI Bil  and do not have to complete an in-depth 
review.37 
The IRAP rule does not align IRAPs with the funding streams. The explanations accompanying 
the rule specify that the special considerations afforded to registered apprenticeship programs by 
some other programs do not extend to IRAP programs, but they note that IRAP programs may 
                                              
30 See  29 C.F.R. 29.5(a)(4) for registered apprenticeship policy. 
31 29 C.F.R. 29.22(a)(4)(iii). 
32 29 C.F.R. 29.5(b)(5). 
33 29 C.F.R. 22(a)(4)(vii). 
34 29 C.F.R. 29.22(a)(4)(viii). For a discussion of the IRAP EEO provisions compared to the registered apprenti ceship 
EEO provisions, see the Federal Register  notice, pp. 14323-14324. 
35 For a summary of these funding  sources, see U.S.  Department of Labor, The Federal Resources Playbook for 
Registered Apprenticeship, https://www.doleta.gov/oa/federalresources/playbook.pdf. 
36 For a detailed discussion  of the interaction of registered apprenticeship and WIOA, see DOL T raining and 
Employment Guidance Letter (T EGL) 13-16, January 12, 2017, https://wdr.doleta.gov/directives/attach/TEGL/
T EGL_13-16_acc.pdf. 
37 See  38 U.S.C.  3672 and CRS  Report R44728, The Role of State Approving Agencies in the Administration of GI Bill 
Benefits. 
Congressional Research Service 
7 
Final Rule on Industry-Recognized Apprenticeship Programs 
 
qualify for more general forms of workforce funding.38 The IRAP rule further clarifies that the 
exception to prevailing wage laws under the Davis-Bacon Act for participants in registered 
apprenticeship programs does not extend to IRAPs.39 
 
 
 
Author Information 
 
Benjamin Collins 
   
Analyst in Labor Policy 
    
 
 
Disclaimer 
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan 
shared staff to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and 
under the direction of Congress. Information in a CRS Report should n ot be relied upon for purposes other 
than public understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in 
connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not 
subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in 
its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or 
material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you wish to 
copy or otherwise use copyrighted material. 
 
                                              
38 See  the Federal Register notice, p. 14299, which specifies “ where Federal  programs confer categorical eligibility, 
exclusive funding,  or special status to registered apprenticeship programs, such benefits do not extend to IRAPs.”  
39 Federal Register  notice, p. 14323. 
Congressional Research Service  
R46622 · VERSION 1 · NEW 
8